找回密码
 注册
查看: 1282|回复: 0

薄膜资料(Thin film Material)连续送第4部分!

[复制链接]
发表于 2006-5-5 19:55:24 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
1.2 Film deposition methods
3 H" \  k! t0 V$ Z7 e" jPhysical vapor deposition (PVD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) are) b) w  d% B8 D# q7 O7 Q0 ?
the most common methods for transferring material atom by atom from
2 D' j" ^! i0 ]6 u; S8 vone or more sources to the growth surface of a ¯lm being deposited onto; P" K% A  D8 |# T- V
a substrate. Vapor deposition describes any process in which a solid immersed* r/ g6 A( F- E, O9 G
in a vapor becomes larger in mass due to transference of material
7 D- e1 l1 d( @from the vapor onto the solid surface. The deposition is normally carried3 D/ N- ^) t8 ~* n) k, I9 i2 X
out in a vacuum chamber to enable control of the vapor composition. If the" s5 H6 L9 |) q  S# S
vapor is created by physical means without a chemical reaction, the process
; o2 A0 K* e9 |/ F$ [is classi¯ed as PVD; if the material deposited is the product of a chemical6 k+ y$ {: Z( W$ f" ^3 C2 @
reaction, the process is classi¯ed as CVD. Many variations of these basic
7 s% T. s% y" {' j3 y1 l9 Mvapor deposition methods have been developed in e®orts to balance advantages% s* t' [6 ]! j# n& F0 a
and disadvantages of various strategies based on the requirements of( {" A2 x2 q' b0 s! S
¯lm purity, structural quality, the rate of growth, temperature constraints
- z+ n3 |1 Q$ y- b- @# n6 W7 \1.2 Film deposition methods 7+ S' K# m& b2 {3 M4 p0 x8 `% D) C
source
* K% V+ _- N! t0 Hbase
+ h$ Z: N6 [1 q% A8 tpressure, Pb
- f8 R  ~, O- }h
0 ]4 ]5 u) T$ P- c0 H. \substrate9 o4 c( K+ A& n- ?: S
Ts
1 ^& X' I+ k& w! Z: {: d1 wθ$ ~* E% p1 Q1 \- P
vacuum1 R, ?4 f* ]  E9 u/ n0 F
Fig. 1.2. Schematic showing the basic features of evaporative deposition system.! |, n7 ^& \: [/ _8 m# C
and other factors. In this section, the salient features of these processing
" {8 P- S6 E. e2 W% c' Smethods are brie°y described. This is of general interest because the state
8 N1 i- B- f1 C* ?% lof stress in a ¯lm can be strongly in°uenced by its deposition history, as1 P# M  F! I* [7 E3 o  S( k
described in the later sections of this chapter.
, U* s4 L1 R/ R% h% X2 @1 a1.2.1 Physical vapor deposition( F6 Z! B: A: Z; g  [4 `' _( ?* J
Physical vapor deposition is a technique whereby physical processes, such
8 i1 M2 }8 w- V: das evaporation, sublimation or ionic impingement on a target, facilitate the
; p; n% E% c8 etransfer of atoms from a solid or molten source onto a substrate. Evaporation
' U$ ^( e$ L7 z! |9 Tand sputtering are the two most widely used PVD methods for depositing8 z9 y4 V# v& M" K% k) m( V* K; v
¯lms.
& O& C& T; F6 z! b( lFigure 1.2 schematically illustrates the basic features of evaporative
) c. U. m# a+ Z& ^  sdeposition. In this process, thermal energy is supplied to a source from which
% I: L: s, [# e2 \atoms are evaporated for deposition onto a substrate. The vapor source con-
& O' b' B  K- z8 \' v¯guration is intended to concentrate heat near the source material and to
% t3 c3 o* S9 B; Iavoid heeding the surroundings. Heating of the source material can be accomplished
; R' ?4 Q5 j' y3 K- a9 ?: G' Kby any of several methods. The simplest is resistance heating of
; ~" M( A* C2 ^$ J8 v' Oa wire or stripe of refractory metal to which the material to be evaporated2 R+ k6 k+ E0 W# W7 g, D6 \7 K6 [
is attached. Larger volumes of source material can be heated in crucibles3 i: S8 T! m4 I2 f4 D. z
of refractory metals, oxides or carbon by resistance heating, high frequency
- t& u) L) q& h0 dinduction heating, or electron beam evaporation. The evaporated atoms& z0 K3 N$ K( k4 f9 j2 s# j+ }
travel through reduced background pressure p in the evaporation chamber5 s5 a: p' F, \+ q" O
and condense on the growth surface. The deposition rate _R of the ¯lm is
: A5 e5 g2 m, [commonly denoted by the number of atoms arriving at the substrate per0 H* i8 p/ p4 @7 m9 R
8 Introduction and Overview
1 h7 B, t1 E- y9 D7 n0 @2 {unit area of the substrate per unit time, by the time required to deposit
3 y- V; s- x( |- ?- C% G3 D( Za full atomic layer of ¯lm material, or by the average normal speed of the4 j& z% S% s( y$ {  g9 O
growth surface of the ¯lm. The deposition rate or °ux is a function of the
8 B2 M, Q  }: x6 N& h' Utravel distance from the source to the substrate, the angle of impingement
% r6 e, u* Z! P0 L+ Donto the substrate surface, the substrate temperature Ts, and the base pressure3 {) _4 ^3 B! T6 U- j8 a. k" m
p. If the source material (such as Cr, Fe, Mo, Si and Ti) undergoes
  M" f, @3 `" F; G! I6 xsublimation, su±ciently large vapor pressures may be obtained below its7 R) J+ R' {5 R( O
melting temperature so that a solid source could be employed for evaporative
% b, m  A+ I$ W+ _( Xdeposition. On the other hand, for most metals in which a su±ciently
) ?+ M. {' F4 F3 @1 mlarge vapor pressure (» 10−3 torr, or 0.13 Pa) cannot be achieved at or
" V6 M# Y5 R* V, R2 n* c" s) ^below the melting temperature, the source is heated to a liquid state so as
/ H  s3 @; O5 p0 Y* _& q; |6 V! C% hto achieve proper deposition conditions.
) d2 `( S& {, L9 B2 ^Metal alloys, such as Al{Cu, Co{Cr or Ni{Cr, can generally be evaporated
5 ^# d& |+ @' ?, b3 X7 t1 G. e+ M) ndirectly from a single heated source. If two constituents of the alloy
# k0 s5 C& q* ?+ w; Q* @evaporate at di®erent rates causing the composition to change in the melt," ?, q* g; `; o3 T! f/ m
two di®erent sources held at di®erent temperatures may be employed to
1 V+ y- n. A  q! G6 xensure uniform deposition. Unlike metals and alloys, inorganic compounds
& z: d- t4 T) |2 t/ Hevaporate in such a way that the vapor composition is usually di®erent from+ T6 B. T# g' j! p- L/ E
that of the source. The resulting molecular structure causes the ¯lm stoichiometry
  n' g( y! d: [+ L, H1 w% |; ?to be di®erent from that of the source. High purity ¯lms of9 }2 E5 S& \! a+ w9 e
virtually all materials can be deposited in vacuum by means of electron
- M* c. F! g% Z8 Wbeam evaporation.
! v5 o0 y  `$ f# N" V: N" A$ \Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) is an example of an evaporative method.5 g) Q2 O) A& e: s5 G% h- q
This growth technique can provide ¯lm materials of extraordinarily good
# J% K3 B  `# Q. H0 f& X1 nquality which are ideal for research purposes. However, the rate of growth
. R% \% y2 r3 `$ n( P! J  Uis very low compared to other methods, which makes it of limited use for1 ^3 r) h  c8 Z3 m
production of devices. In MBE, the deposition of a thin ¯lm can be accurately) N/ i$ }; T; y& V
controlled at the atomic level in an ultra-high vacuum (10−10 torr, or
' N& E1 K$ k/ M, {1.33£10−8 Pa). A substrate wafer is placed in the ultra-high vacuum chamber.2 w0 r% i1 k3 X5 l4 g& y
It is sputtered brie°y with a low energy ion beam to remove surface
3 |8 [3 h7 E1 D4 Qcontamination. This step is followed by a high temperature anneal to relax
1 ^8 S+ @; j/ Bany damage done to the growth surface during preparation. The substrate
1 Q# Y$ R, F0 Y9 W. eis then cooled to the growth temperature, typically between 400 and 700 ◦C,
- d) `; h8 e' ?, n' ~and growth commences by directing atomic beams of the ¯lm material, as  ]9 g! a, U; z1 Q
well as a beam of dopant material if necessary, toward the growth surface of7 \1 `4 [" g3 M  j: |
the substrate. The beams are emitted from crucibles of the growth materials8 N1 x" r2 J* l% z0 G/ A" |
which have been heated to temperatures well above the substrate temperature
2 x" {8 U0 A, `! D& e1 Lto induce evaporation and condensation. The ¯lms may be examined
$ L6 ~2 n" _) X% w, Yby transmission electron microscopy or x-ray di®raction after cooling. The
* C7 q/ c1 N$ L7 p: ccomplete history of evolution of internal stress in the ¯lm during deposi1.2
* M+ u6 B6 d5 i, q+ y8 u5 v, Y4 D# }Film deposition methods 9
9 g$ @% }" k6 t% d) K1 jtion can be obtained in situ by monitoring the changes in curvature of the) O( `3 z% }: Z4 Z; U+ z7 d
substrate on which the ¯lm is deposited as described in detail in Chapter 2.
* Q- H0 X5 n) n! L# lvacuum Ar
$ W, Q, u  ~3 b- c  l3 a; QSput t er
* b5 j/ v7 h2 U1 x3 igas* k, }2 x  e; o( C  y: n4 c
t arget- t# n% b6 H) a- [
(cathode)
5 W% I- H& h  E) q- u- ]& Psubst rat e
% o9 ~$ R1 a8 |0 S(anode)2 O& F) _) F) h5 ]$ x5 J) h
glow discharge (Ar+)
3 |; H8 f% m' Z5 O. K6 m. ^% \DC
8 ~9 |- Y* a/ X6 n5 X8 Ivolt age3 w9 r) S6 E: H4 Q+ `
source (or)
1 y" Q4 t: l% ZFig. 1.3. Schematic showing the basic features of a dc sputter deposition system.
# D% l+ T2 Y/ O% D( o: wIn sputter deposition, ions of a sputtering gas, typically Ar, are accelerated
. H/ D4 V9 O' Q- X, J' h" q7 ^toward the target at high speed by an imposed electric ¯eld. The initial( M# H% m& f# U) O8 ]* Q
concentration of charge carriers in the system is signi¯cantly increased
  {+ c2 k/ b+ W0 Uwith an increase in the dc voltage, as the ions collide with the cathode,
3 m: m- H% X1 t. t  k, ]thereby releasing secondary electrons, and with the neutral gas atoms. As
6 W$ f& F4 k& G& o) xcritical numbers of electrons and ions are created through such avalanches,
% N; C9 V, I) E  ithe gas begins to glow and the discharge becomes self-sustaining. Gaseous
1 ~, ?. h* }2 g6 c3 xions striking the target or the source material from which the ¯lm is made
% h4 F' q4 L/ _+ D9 \, z( @; Ydislodge surface atoms which form the vapor in the chamber. The target is
3 K& M' G4 U2 Mreferred to as the cathode since it is connected to the negative side of the, X+ M$ M$ Y; [% O% X( M, q
direct current power supply. Figure 1.3 schematically shows the basic elements; c+ u! {4 r" r3 N
of a sputter deposition system. The chamber is evacuated and then
: C3 L* i, @" ]/ ]8 j9 FAr gas, at a pressure of approximately 13.3 Pa (10−1 torr), is introduced for
1 f; C$ b! r  y  E( Bthe purpose of maintaining a visible glow discharge. The Ar+ ions bombard
6 w" c9 D1 k; [1 v: ~) o9 u7 E1 v  Ethe target or cathode, and the ensuing momentum transfer causes the neu10
% w( D: H! L) {( ]/ gIntroduction and Overview' ~9 Z# t4 `+ c- W: l4 _0 ?
tral atoms of the target source to be dislodged. These atoms transit through7 ~6 A7 r+ L/ E$ m) j
the discharge and condense onto the substrate, thus providing ¯lm growth., M% y3 l6 C& Z$ o" A' T
Several di®erent sputtering methods are widely used for the deposition
. R0 N) |" F4 Eof thin ¯lms in di®erent practical applications: (i) dc sputtering (also
8 D# b4 ]3 N! Dcommonly referred to as cathodic or diode sputtering), (ii) radio frequency6 u7 f5 C( [. r+ N& w9 l  |$ E
(rf) sputtering with frequencies typically in the 5{30 MHz range, (iii) magnetron, [% n" f# U" g' o6 {
sputtering, where a magnetic ¯eld is applied in superposition with a0 z4 C9 _/ L' e3 C5 b/ s/ C/ W
parallel or perpendicularly oriented electric ¯eld between the substrate and
" p4 m9 s2 Q9 ?5 R' @! [" ythe target source, and (iv) bias sputtering, where either a negative dc or rf; z1 v1 R% f: _5 d! v
bias voltage is applied to the substrate so as to vary the energy and °ux of
' y1 b) x, N! z* ithe incident charged species.- u& Q* \. @8 z' `) \
There are many distinctions between the sputtering process and the
& @* W' \* q/ q& Wevaporative process for ¯lm deposition, as described by Ohring (1992) for
5 @: Z1 F6 _- @- l% `( iexample. Evaporation is a thermal process where the atoms of the material  Q5 z8 v2 A, D% s  |- C8 A! y
to be deposited arrive at the growth surface with a low kinetic energy. In
/ }, k0 l1 U2 ksputtering, on the other hand, the bombardment of the target source by Ar+
2 z% z7 Y* }" E5 B& a, U# y/ [8 Hions imparts a high kinetic energy to the expelled source atoms. Although1 Y2 B9 S% y+ S- s  d+ S* Q
sputter deposition promotes high surface di®usivity of arriving atoms, it
- l. r# H  @) w' `+ m  Nalso leads to greater defect nucleation and damage at the deposition surface
! b0 d! ]$ }/ ~! {9 k1 x4 V: @because of the high energy of the atoms. While evaporation occurs in a' \2 b3 Q7 J7 _( e
high vacuum (10−6 to 10−10 torr, or 1.33£10−4 to 1.33£10−8 Pa), sputtered
& V( k4 Q1 |& m9 T* ?atoms transit through a high pressure discharge zone with a pressure
% q4 q" H! L# w. t! @of approximately 0.1 torr (13.33 Pa). Sputter-deposited ¯lms generally contain! p. _& A% S3 X5 j
a higher concentration of impurity atoms than do ¯lms deposited by
3 \$ ]- f, w# I6 h: ievaporation, and are prone to contamination by the sputtering gas. As a
9 c- r" V' Y' [5 F2 ^: Z$ nresult, sputter deposition is not well suited for epitaxial growth of ¯lms.: N' n/ F2 |' n  k% B
For polycrystalline ¯lms, the ¯lm grain structure resulting from sputter
+ n# \& E8 w& c  f2 J9 s. }7 }deposition typically has many crystallographic orientations without preferred
2 a2 r( x: \, L1 ]texture. However, evaporative deposition leads to highly textured0 u. o3 r/ ~2 w8 l2 u1 [6 m
¯lms for which the grain size is typically greater than that of the sputtered
  X7 u  [- M# \; P% E. o) _& Q¯lms. Sputter deposition o®ers better control in maintaining stoichiometry4 G& [1 r# q9 m4 j
and ¯lm thickness uniformity than evaporative deposition, and has the °exibility
5 ~) W: R5 ]2 j: X; r' `1 sto deposit essentially any crystalline and amorphous materials. These
# \/ F' O/ Z/ \* J  M4 cissues are discussed in more detail in Section 1.8.
* H4 {( ?, Z$ g1.2.2 Chemical vapor deposition" Z( x6 u# a( x- s/ _. a
Chemical vapor deposition is a versatile deposition technique that provides
3 ]7 ]9 T! U/ x9 ]  ua means of growing thin ¯lms of elemental and compound semiconductors,1 T- e9 m8 Z8 K3 L
metal alloys and amorphous or crystalline compounds of di®erent stoichiom1.2
: o" Z$ H9 @% v; f: y! m7 XFilm deposition methods 11
+ J3 G+ B* i( H, Y    8 S- V2 A7 N1 c' C" o% c9 y
 
7 O" g% c+ ^9 a! l  z% N
; t2 X% ]& f3 c) ?/ @* m) ?9 z5 Q9 _ ) C$ o/ i3 W; W6 r7 p7 E- \
1 H# H% k: l" x0 k3 B9 W
6 d/ T; x2 k" |

! _+ C2 K& P8 ^
2 W( h! @- t- T( S * G9 m1 m; H' n0 ]+ H: U, `1 N. X

8 f, r+ i" @- [  `! L5 w+ E! w0 L- ~
       
/ B) G1 _5 P4 ]+ G- m      
& a3 y( S- Q" P/ H    
7 m# ]: S& P& q0 u; b! S3 R, i3 K/ a! k
 # ~5 r- A5 L7 ~6 L) y
      ( g1 y" c: w* {/ m

- M0 R# A2 o2 o5 l0 l% l!
  D& Q/ R& d, z' q& v9 a3 Z! ZFig. 1.4. Schematic showing the basic features of an open reactor system for chemical' z% Q* f, j' `+ n  X$ n2 K: l0 j
vapor deposition.
. S0 T" Y, ?1 ~& |2 |- [. f& ?* wetry. The basic principle underlying this method is a chemical reaction between- S8 W/ r7 n$ ]9 O
a volatile compound of the material from which the ¯lm is to be made
2 p5 q: K, W' O" b0 ^& ^with other suitable gases so as to facilitate the atomic deposition of a nonvolatile
- p! z1 N  O( e' {- D2 [, D& }solid ¯lm on a substrate, as indicated schematically in Figure 1.4.5 ?, `, u( Z) J
The chemical reaction in a CVD process may involve pyrolysis or reduction.
* u# J# Z5 f$ u% K) z3 P6 hConsider the production of amorphous or polycrystalline Si ¯lms on
  ^  @$ F3 }, ?- ~Si substrates, where pyrolysis at 650 ◦C leads to the decomposition of silane
/ w, J9 p: M9 @( W+ `5 N' ogas according to the reaction
" J! I! G; K  ?9 ySiH4(g) ! Si(s) + 2H2(g).+ `/ \- y, [: M' U* E' x
High-temperature reduction reactions where hydrogen gas is used as a reducing
% I) f: k3 j: [$ ^" Yagent are also employed to produce epitaxial growth of Si ¯lms on# b  Z, t1 T: |6 @  K% l+ ]9 l
monocrystalline Si substrates at 1200 ◦C according to the reaction0 u- a/ r1 t9 _1 Q/ l. w% Q
SiCl4(g) + 2H2(g) ! Si(s) + 4HCl(g).8 k: o9 D2 Q5 v
The nature of epitaxy is described in detail later in this chapter.6 i* N$ ]9 f2 U
In CVD, as in PVD, vapor supersaturation a®ects the nucleation rate
" I1 ^2 C% e' B  n  E8 Pof the ¯lm whereas substrate temperature in°uences the rate of ¯lm growth.
7 D) G" K: z' t( `4 rThese two factors together in°uence the extent of epitaxy, grain size, grain9 B1 U, F7 [- v" e- W
shape and texture. Low gas supersaturation and high substrate temperatures) ?& t, a7 B8 ]
promote the growth of single crystal ¯lms on substrates. High gas
% [+ @, P3 D) I/ rsupersaturation and low substrate temperatures result in the growth of less  d) a4 Z- V$ S% i" R
coherent, and possibly amorphous, ¯lms. Low-pressure CVD (LPCVD),! ]8 Q, C8 @; O+ ?9 a$ b" n" z7 M, t
plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD), laser-enhanced CVD (LECVD) and metalorganic
- N+ d8 @- |1 v  c$ ?CVD (MOCVD) are variants of the CVD process used in many+ c" W) B& X% J1 O. o2 G6 e8 g
situations to achieve particular objectives.
8 t0 [" _+ f( \/ {2 g! f+ N12 Introduction and Overview
8 r- m' P$ a( x1.2.3 Thermal spray deposition# c7 [' M: S& S! R
powder injection
' j8 |& q: d. }! i" ^% o4 t. D4 a; qinternal external6 E4 P, W2 T9 ]1 L8 }: k6 J3 M& ]
water
2 n+ |, r3 H# V- kcooling
$ Z4 V9 \  d9 Y. bspray
- q8 S% Y8 X% {2 ytorch8 `: \% K/ _' H' B8 `6 D4 v. ]
plasma gases
) t7 M5 M5 D! r. uparticles in flight in
4 q/ H4 v1 I$ V5 Zmolten, semimolten,4 r- D& ~; ^3 r: ~; U
or solid state
% o0 v; N6 @# J: }2 p; S- vsubstrate- L$ w* }2 g2 O! M. Z# N+ J2 t* u
air or vacuum chamber
9 n& F$ _/ a6 i+ e; S" W! K. dFig. 1.5. Schematic illustration of the thermal spray process.
2 l9 R/ t  \8 ]& i  y/ jThe thermal spray process of thin ¯lm fabrication refers broadly to a8 z5 x8 Y  Y, ~
range of deposition conditions wherein a stream of molten particles impinges# H. Z$ H7 R( |. l  T/ L! H4 O
onto a growth surface. In this process, which is illustrated schematically in2 r+ t. k; S/ w, {- a- D1 @' L) O9 V
Figure 1.5, a thermal plasma arc or a combustion °ame is used to melt and- e5 Q# N3 H" j# g- p- |( [! P
accelerate particles of metals, ceramics, polymers or their composites to high( i4 B4 H! }' h% b. N# w1 Y! ?
velocities in a directed stream toward the substrate. The sudden deceleration4 z8 V% R7 Y( y% E8 i% V1 Y) n
of a particle upon impact at the growth surface leads to lateral spreading and
( q5 g/ q  @/ v8 jrapid solidi¯cation of the particle forming a `splat' in a very short time. The
. A# C9 H6 S3 O( l) A# e8 Vcharacteristics of the splat are determined by the size, chemistry, velocity,9 u9 o) z8 c6 w1 o3 g
degree of melting and angle of impact of the impinging droplets, and by the
6 H2 p% q3 Y5 J( J3 O3 x# htemperature, composition and roughness of the substrate surface. Successive
  @8 U* h2 q1 j" U& r9 ?2 uimpingement of the droplets leads to the formation of a lamellar structure. S" _. q) M( |: e
in the deposit. The oxidation of particles during thermal spray of metals4 G1 C3 J6 r7 h, i* J" D) c! c
also results in pores and contaminants along the splat boundaries. Quench
9 Z' t; g2 a6 q* B# Pstresses and thermal mismatch stresses in the deposit are partially relieved
% M) B& V4 Z- e7 a9 g3 x/ Mby the formation of microcracks or pores along the inter-splat boundaries
) R* ^- o# K4 A3 K) j2 ^' tand by plastic yielding or creep of the deposited material. There are several% w( G9 e4 G. u- }1 k
di®erent types of thermal spray processes, a review of which can be found
, r, A9 w# O) f! Min Herman et al. (2000).' {' ]7 l, A3 L8 [
Continuous or step-wise gradients in composition through the thickness" J+ G$ A8 ^$ i8 w  F
of the layer can be achieved by use of multiple nozzles whereby the
% `: D+ `" k* f3 O" B! P3 Y; W1.2 Film deposition methods 13
/ V7 S' b5 e! d& J4 g$ r) I1 CFig. 1.6. Scanning electron micrographs showing the microstructures of plasmaspray9 ~% q3 y( R' |5 w
coating of NiCrAlY on a 1020 steel substrate. (a) Air plasma spray coated
3 E  C; X5 S! w. Q  `5 S* }layer with inter-splat cracks whose origin can be traced to the oxidation of Al in/ @+ Q$ p1 Q# V, I
the coated material during deposition. (b) Vacuum plasma sprayed coating of the
0 C0 d$ J- T2 `9 J6 Bsame material without inter-splat microcracks. Reproduced with permission from" C$ ^& h2 \6 H( Z
Alcala et al. (2001).)
- S+ m) o: _) ]' p& H°ow rate of the constituent phases of the deposited composite can be modulated& J/ M# J- u. W; M
during spray, as demonstrated by Kesler et al. (1997). Alternatively,
+ z+ M+ c7 W1 r* Z: ?/ r% {% _the feed rate of the powders of the di®erent constituent phases can also/ L  Z7 v( ]4 N3 I9 e
be controlled appropriately during thermal spray so as to deposit a graded
9 M) M6 `5 x2 O; L9 Z) ?. Hlayer onto a substrate. Gradients in porosity can be introduced through the; _$ f- P: J8 M
thickness of the deposited layer by manipulating the processing parameters
" L: Y8 P1 Q7 e  xand deposition conditions.9 ~6 o8 o) A% z% B! Q1 r
The plasma spray technique o®ers a straightforward and cost-e®ective
0 h! W" p& c: F9 {: X$ o' O1 H3 smeans to spray deposits of metals and ceramics that are tens to hundreds of2 K8 r4 z9 \$ y6 r# x
micrometers in thickness onto a variety of substrates in applications involving9 m: b3 r& t& f# v9 x& d
thermal-barrier or insulator coatings. Typical plasma-spray deposits are
# m! A4 S) i  r; }  e1 S$ ~; mporous, with only 85{90% of theoretical density.5 H+ G1 j2 P! j% ^2 w; I+ i' H
14 Introduction and Overview
5 ]4 C. f# F* JFor applications requiring higher density coatings with a strong adhesion
0 _7 `! x/ ]$ ^+ qto the substrate, low-pressure plasma spray is employed where spraying
( @+ J7 H: q* C, h% I  u+ Iis done in an inert-gas container operating at a reduced pressure. Vacuum  L9 w6 s' ]- R' s0 _
plasma spray is another thermal spray process which is used to improve
8 Q+ Y5 V1 d$ T; ^1 opurity of the deposited material and to reduce porosity and defect content,
; g* {1 r" ?& x# L  S& Lalbeit at a higher cost than air plasma spray.( M0 p2 S; k# n
Figure 1.6(a) is a representative micrograph of the cross-section of an
1 {: Z# _/ t( v& Iair-plasma-sprayed NiCrAlY coating, commonly used as a bondcoat between
% ]" F  j4 O4 R9 ?: [) n7 Ha ceramic thermal barrier coating and a nickel-base superalloy substrate in& ~" i8 H4 H# B5 V& ~- d8 v
gas turbine engines, as described in the example in the next subsection. This1 ^  z2 ~2 p/ E; ]  }# s6 \; _/ l
coating was deposited onto a 1020 steel substrate. The dark streaks are5 `; w5 Q( M4 O# `0 x# ~1 T
the inter-splat boundaries along which microcracks and voids have formed.
  w+ T/ M; M; R: l" nThe origins of these defects could be traced to the formation of Al2O3 during$ M9 I* E# X6 q) h: u( _
deposition (Alcala et al. 2001). On the other hand, vacuum plasma3 r  p+ T( `1 ~" Z, Z8 R
spray deposition of the same material onto the steel substrate results in the
! E: e  w# ~+ X: n& K- r( @3 Bsuppression of such oxidation and the attendant cracking of the inter-splat6 f* H: t" f% s5 P" b0 g5 [
boundaries, as shown in Figure 1.6(b). The resulting coating has a more' q( m7 H: N. I
uniform microstructure with a signi¯cantly reduced pore density.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|光学薄膜论坛

GMT, 2025-10-14 , Processed in 0.037467 second(s), 23 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

© 2001-2025 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表