|
1.2 Film deposition methods7 O- H8 h8 d G, h( {% A$ _
Physical vapor deposition (PVD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) are
; H$ u/ _& b, g; I6 f3 S4 c% Fthe most common methods for transferring material atom by atom from
2 u1 T; q1 W& x8 z4 Xone or more sources to the growth surface of a ¯lm being deposited onto4 P3 W/ ]! v6 q& {9 K
a substrate. Vapor deposition describes any process in which a solid immersed
% w! a2 X1 s* o8 Y, n4 oin a vapor becomes larger in mass due to transference of material
9 c+ n3 O `! f& V: y% Hfrom the vapor onto the solid surface. The deposition is normally carried! `+ Z5 g* }) j* q+ P' T' [
out in a vacuum chamber to enable control of the vapor composition. If the
/ L9 g9 e, ^8 \' j" @9 Q/ J# rvapor is created by physical means without a chemical reaction, the process& W* Q \4 J, d: g7 m
is classi¯ed as PVD; if the material deposited is the product of a chemical# [+ A3 l6 j% H% \) j$ J) n
reaction, the process is classi¯ed as CVD. Many variations of these basic J4 M- i: W: _1 p* ]! x- p. G8 M$ L1 R
vapor deposition methods have been developed in e®orts to balance advantages
0 X* H! R3 R5 M9 y" Vand disadvantages of various strategies based on the requirements of8 `' M4 D: u' |6 A: v1 ]8 m
¯lm purity, structural quality, the rate of growth, temperature constraints
: \& C1 e; x4 K1 n1.2 Film deposition methods 73 y1 Q& C6 O: X1 G
source
0 C/ `* G- ^8 T' abase
6 H$ A7 g3 ^& }' E* l ?! fpressure, Pb- o4 O3 b' p/ ], s1 G
h
7 k% L9 t- p1 ^& }substrate8 p3 F- Y L* J4 k! h
Ts" |5 ^ {3 Z- q4 \6 J: r8 C2 P
θ) {: N! h; C# Y0 m
vacuum
( K2 F I# x( YFig. 1.2. Schematic showing the basic features of evaporative deposition system.
, L) ?! ]2 }6 u6 cand other factors. In this section, the salient features of these processing- z! D0 L% w8 V: w" L5 H
methods are brie°y described. This is of general interest because the state
( y" m* G: u6 N/ n; b6 o* mof stress in a ¯lm can be strongly in°uenced by its deposition history, as7 [+ u, W6 T! ?, ~
described in the later sections of this chapter. f" L& t" ]) O! S( }9 K
1.2.1 Physical vapor deposition s9 h4 z! n' h3 Z0 a; g0 j
Physical vapor deposition is a technique whereby physical processes, such
3 l8 a) F4 i7 Gas evaporation, sublimation or ionic impingement on a target, facilitate the, O; y7 r& S) k" {+ h+ P* Q k! I
transfer of atoms from a solid or molten source onto a substrate. Evaporation
" J' ?$ F/ \. Gand sputtering are the two most widely used PVD methods for depositing% g' c2 m( J' C, a
¯lms.' {" H+ u* T; `( P: N5 G/ x
Figure 1.2 schematically illustrates the basic features of evaporative
, q$ O ]' R8 v3 Xdeposition. In this process, thermal energy is supplied to a source from which! @" Z: n8 O' w
atoms are evaporated for deposition onto a substrate. The vapor source con-
( e9 n, H5 J' G+ G" v7 r¯guration is intended to concentrate heat near the source material and to
" N- W4 }8 |. b( u+ {" H" ]avoid heeding the surroundings. Heating of the source material can be accomplished: ]1 I: d6 t" z
by any of several methods. The simplest is resistance heating of
5 p- F1 _! j7 e I: ~( s. ra wire or stripe of refractory metal to which the material to be evaporated
: y2 e, k' `: B4 A2 p' u1 ]3 F4 Ais attached. Larger volumes of source material can be heated in crucibles3 B. K j5 j* H+ P/ d9 |1 s
of refractory metals, oxides or carbon by resistance heating, high frequency
* ~" f) ^$ d; h0 B/ ~induction heating, or electron beam evaporation. The evaporated atoms
7 d7 J) v5 u6 o6 G$ Utravel through reduced background pressure p in the evaporation chamber
' O! w6 x* k0 t* g" O: Pand condense on the growth surface. The deposition rate _R of the ¯lm is
) p0 `( v' R/ s/ r, r) i( Mcommonly denoted by the number of atoms arriving at the substrate per; F% r$ [- E) G5 D; `
8 Introduction and Overview' D. T& A2 H( T* N0 w2 [
unit area of the substrate per unit time, by the time required to deposit
% M7 r J4 F, l' V( n* ~# s) U0 d) \a full atomic layer of ¯lm material, or by the average normal speed of the
3 F" R" F- ~7 _8 d2 }/ Jgrowth surface of the ¯lm. The deposition rate or °ux is a function of the
* u2 [$ f) Y, V9 Vtravel distance from the source to the substrate, the angle of impingement
6 j4 @ N6 O5 I* }7 N% jonto the substrate surface, the substrate temperature Ts, and the base pressure
6 Y. ?$ C% a4 H4 w5 a% Np. If the source material (such as Cr, Fe, Mo, Si and Ti) undergoes
6 B6 C. p, x+ S" V: t3 F$ ^sublimation, su±ciently large vapor pressures may be obtained below its
5 F. D8 I4 e. R, wmelting temperature so that a solid source could be employed for evaporative
7 j+ ?- k! X R. Z/ M W' q* Edeposition. On the other hand, for most metals in which a su±ciently
$ [7 ~+ i; O9 l3 a$ Q9 m% E$ Klarge vapor pressure (» 10−3 torr, or 0.13 Pa) cannot be achieved at or5 q- G' N* k. v/ m1 c: ` S
below the melting temperature, the source is heated to a liquid state so as. D6 b" |' i @: N$ }6 ~
to achieve proper deposition conditions.( v' W* s8 E$ W V" _8 E4 V% T# w
Metal alloys, such as Al{Cu, Co{Cr or Ni{Cr, can generally be evaporated2 t' ~% u: p8 c* Y) W: P5 o
directly from a single heated source. If two constituents of the alloy
- C0 r0 Q2 v* h( yevaporate at di®erent rates causing the composition to change in the melt,
8 |) [; d3 F/ Z& R Btwo di®erent sources held at di®erent temperatures may be employed to
1 u V- f' e: Y+ J/ p( ~9 ~- hensure uniform deposition. Unlike metals and alloys, inorganic compounds
/ b5 O. L; a* w5 Z4 |5 K, ?evaporate in such a way that the vapor composition is usually di®erent from
/ _4 N/ w) R% g9 M" {/ Dthat of the source. The resulting molecular structure causes the ¯lm stoichiometry6 g5 D! V/ u# k9 n1 X; C
to be di®erent from that of the source. High purity ¯lms of, Q8 h) x+ b. o- @5 x2 o
virtually all materials can be deposited in vacuum by means of electron2 I0 Z, M, X2 v6 @: D* D. m
beam evaporation.6 k5 R0 }& t. \; e7 C
Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) is an example of an evaporative method.
6 ?0 `9 @- x( ` l9 y8 X: w/ UThis growth technique can provide ¯lm materials of extraordinarily good, `" _+ m, o+ s3 v: u
quality which are ideal for research purposes. However, the rate of growth: g; ^4 T! T$ `6 u4 b8 p$ O) a
is very low compared to other methods, which makes it of limited use for
, g' }& K3 F* ^% O) B; k0 _7 Vproduction of devices. In MBE, the deposition of a thin ¯lm can be accurately/ h6 n3 F/ A( H' f( v
controlled at the atomic level in an ultra-high vacuum (10−10 torr, or! a( Q6 C6 q# n$ B) ^8 m c
1.33£10−8 Pa). A substrate wafer is placed in the ultra-high vacuum chamber.
' r. z) M* F: F: U- S/ cIt is sputtered brie°y with a low energy ion beam to remove surface
" S6 Z7 a4 e9 V6 Hcontamination. This step is followed by a high temperature anneal to relax& p$ S& b$ z& ~3 b0 X$ A0 ^
any damage done to the growth surface during preparation. The substrate* S0 m- F- D3 y& Z+ g3 U) d
is then cooled to the growth temperature, typically between 400 and 700 ◦C,
% I; X8 U! I3 f3 c6 Y: }and growth commences by directing atomic beams of the ¯lm material, as( }! W7 I T. x, q1 b
well as a beam of dopant material if necessary, toward the growth surface of
( K! f- y, R8 b, T: p' o2 X5 \& Othe substrate. The beams are emitted from crucibles of the growth materials5 Y$ @+ y' @" X5 L m' Y* O( R
which have been heated to temperatures well above the substrate temperature5 Q5 N' R* p4 F
to induce evaporation and condensation. The ¯lms may be examined
% p& \1 t2 \- o$ O2 I" Aby transmission electron microscopy or x-ray di®raction after cooling. The% m! l' F; Z! @- z$ A1 l
complete history of evolution of internal stress in the ¯lm during deposi1.29 o/ a# u7 F' @
Film deposition methods 9
+ j3 U2 l4 L! Z! Etion can be obtained in situ by monitoring the changes in curvature of the
1 }/ E, w8 Q& S @ Y; }* ?substrate on which the ¯lm is deposited as described in detail in Chapter 2.$ j5 N2 ?1 J: z: R. T$ ~
vacuum Ar
* v9 }1 T9 v# xSput t er
, R- [ P" N) o6 A: qgas* U5 J: N" w- h5 G% H* F8 L
t arget8 Z& H) h# S2 w' G8 i0 z
(cathode), p6 q- [5 `5 d- ?
subst rat e
3 m. Q, _3 U% h* o# j3 H, l; F, Q(anode)
+ Y* L! y$ l% _" u) O% [" qglow discharge (Ar+)* K# H2 n, {* s' P
DC
) |9 L! ?. u l+ }9 evolt age2 W+ |+ f. @# j/ W0 k( @! O
source (or)) `' Z: K( }) @' F
Fig. 1.3. Schematic showing the basic features of a dc sputter deposition system.
, z5 s: z' P K, k% q. \+ [5 LIn sputter deposition, ions of a sputtering gas, typically Ar, are accelerated; z5 d* r: ]& N0 X9 O3 l
toward the target at high speed by an imposed electric ¯eld. The initial
, j5 G) w1 a* ~! D8 F: Bconcentration of charge carriers in the system is signi¯cantly increased) z) e) x" E, j4 @; O* H1 f; z
with an increase in the dc voltage, as the ions collide with the cathode,! p) K% d3 Q+ {% I' y" S) `
thereby releasing secondary electrons, and with the neutral gas atoms. As
* x C! q) z3 W: L/ hcritical numbers of electrons and ions are created through such avalanches,$ `2 E# Q) y2 ]' Y- ^
the gas begins to glow and the discharge becomes self-sustaining. Gaseous
2 W% H6 E8 }* n r, C4 d: uions striking the target or the source material from which the ¯lm is made9 }% N3 a" m! Q h6 f/ x
dislodge surface atoms which form the vapor in the chamber. The target is
' j7 A- y4 z+ i1 o' a1 zreferred to as the cathode since it is connected to the negative side of the
8 y) r/ @* ?" q: [. j: w! B3 kdirect current power supply. Figure 1.3 schematically shows the basic elements3 g) l7 y4 A5 P
of a sputter deposition system. The chamber is evacuated and then
# p0 e4 }; G5 o# i0 H/ TAr gas, at a pressure of approximately 13.3 Pa (10−1 torr), is introduced for
, {5 Y2 _: x7 d6 u1 C/ ? R+ jthe purpose of maintaining a visible glow discharge. The Ar+ ions bombard; w# |- f+ d0 P: f
the target or cathode, and the ensuing momentum transfer causes the neu107 q/ t5 h# u- v) ^9 ~
Introduction and Overview
7 [' o$ x8 |' O" P3 i: Ptral atoms of the target source to be dislodged. These atoms transit through
, a* M* E1 A& B$ I- Rthe discharge and condense onto the substrate, thus providing ¯lm growth.; F2 q8 A8 D4 G/ l2 m/ K* ~
Several di®erent sputtering methods are widely used for the deposition
. D6 [' I, m+ l! M6 {" g3 b. hof thin ¯lms in di®erent practical applications: (i) dc sputtering (also
7 ?7 o; T' ~6 Wcommonly referred to as cathodic or diode sputtering), (ii) radio frequency. J5 g+ X- i' E( W+ c
(rf) sputtering with frequencies typically in the 5{30 MHz range, (iii) magnetron7 i! d: f( s* X. d9 s l
sputtering, where a magnetic ¯eld is applied in superposition with a2 c+ o2 W; P1 R- p: @" x* W# e, F
parallel or perpendicularly oriented electric ¯eld between the substrate and! \! c: M7 L4 c1 t# j, m! y% z- f9 {) F
the target source, and (iv) bias sputtering, where either a negative dc or rf8 o! }& ~8 E% A4 u( Q* y
bias voltage is applied to the substrate so as to vary the energy and °ux of# Y. }) K1 g$ l8 R: _, Q; _
the incident charged species.! G- Y& J& U& I1 I' K0 {/ ?4 Y
There are many distinctions between the sputtering process and the
( X! y$ }2 E- S, tevaporative process for ¯lm deposition, as described by Ohring (1992) for& C/ j% K& e, m1 }
example. Evaporation is a thermal process where the atoms of the material. z9 q a- [+ p+ s
to be deposited arrive at the growth surface with a low kinetic energy. In
8 t. v) B$ r2 w! g8 D- |sputtering, on the other hand, the bombardment of the target source by Ar+% r: z' P# y, l% @
ions imparts a high kinetic energy to the expelled source atoms. Although
$ t5 ^% G! c$ @8 R' R5 }sputter deposition promotes high surface di®usivity of arriving atoms, it
& O0 `4 a0 F$ L) W( Z+ Lalso leads to greater defect nucleation and damage at the deposition surface
0 _& w$ K# z( N8 f8 dbecause of the high energy of the atoms. While evaporation occurs in a b* t8 n; x8 p, v4 t; a2 ^
high vacuum (10−6 to 10−10 torr, or 1.33£10−4 to 1.33£10−8 Pa), sputtered* p% d1 b% l( G/ d$ V
atoms transit through a high pressure discharge zone with a pressure
& S2 Y- a$ w6 n Xof approximately 0.1 torr (13.33 Pa). Sputter-deposited ¯lms generally contain
H2 s9 d/ \/ N. i& O) g- ra higher concentration of impurity atoms than do ¯lms deposited by) C. m. x9 O( t5 K4 T0 v
evaporation, and are prone to contamination by the sputtering gas. As a. I4 s# e( T, { w) ]$ L
result, sputter deposition is not well suited for epitaxial growth of ¯lms.# j4 p/ C, c0 \1 V$ q$ P
For polycrystalline ¯lms, the ¯lm grain structure resulting from sputter4 d( k+ B/ ?4 g! B# G
deposition typically has many crystallographic orientations without preferred$ z( \1 x+ D- d
texture. However, evaporative deposition leads to highly textured' A2 W6 W2 u& ?* L3 i
¯lms for which the grain size is typically greater than that of the sputtered
o3 m0 K' ~4 |¯lms. Sputter deposition o®ers better control in maintaining stoichiometry# E7 ?7 y% d" H+ W2 {& c
and ¯lm thickness uniformity than evaporative deposition, and has the °exibility
9 W4 g! m4 v: X3 X ^! Y1 d8 t) Mto deposit essentially any crystalline and amorphous materials. These) C' o' d/ @: w; t7 J
issues are discussed in more detail in Section 1.8.$ r: G% y, U) Y$ u% P: q5 Q
1.2.2 Chemical vapor deposition
4 s$ F3 u( _4 W8 \. r8 e0 KChemical vapor deposition is a versatile deposition technique that provides. f5 i7 B; I5 }2 B1 M
a means of growing thin ¯lms of elemental and compound semiconductors,& e0 h ` J( Q, I$ N; N
metal alloys and amorphous or crystalline compounds of di®erent stoichiom1.2" P4 R1 n9 W- n. H
Film deposition methods 11
6 M3 I) l& S) x6 y; ?7 | " T( F5 y+ Y# X( K
# i" |+ y& P& k6 ^! Y
: i1 K4 ]( p5 b) m0 Q3 q0 Q& h% z3 C
' f* N7 x& w. V1 {
4 T6 j% I9 M6 z8 ~
( s; M$ x4 y) B
0 d2 z+ H2 Z( s; H5 C# m. T. |* K4 G7 p+ f5 ?& N, K" z* \
7 w3 Q5 b z- G! k$ M0 s9 [( n" y; T! s+ {# ~: j! U, G. C
8 r, v, B2 M. t. K& v / D5 H, U; e1 S: n) R
9 e2 G! R9 w! I q# p9 b& J6 K
% b5 G2 Z. ?2 k+ c
8 P& b9 I: f+ E, I
2 S& a7 O. X4 [6 I. Z. q! Q( [/ K
) E8 ], M. \% P9 _. ^!
- Q9 X4 |9 D9 k9 ~4 K6 x0 \Fig. 1.4. Schematic showing the basic features of an open reactor system for chemical, F; V3 ~& m, _7 w4 ~# Q# e
vapor deposition.6 m! C0 h0 c) a" l& h9 H& |
etry. The basic principle underlying this method is a chemical reaction between
0 }: @. |# H% P) Ca volatile compound of the material from which the ¯lm is to be made# x# k+ O6 d" L5 D
with other suitable gases so as to facilitate the atomic deposition of a nonvolatile
3 l( [1 ^" L# w) O' Vsolid ¯lm on a substrate, as indicated schematically in Figure 1.4.: c$ q0 x1 }1 {: R# J& x
The chemical reaction in a CVD process may involve pyrolysis or reduction.
6 k+ G1 e/ H& aConsider the production of amorphous or polycrystalline Si ¯lms on
3 A1 x# E& ^, U" K2 ?Si substrates, where pyrolysis at 650 ◦C leads to the decomposition of silane; O0 D8 R+ g& S5 D" [
gas according to the reaction
* C) j. L' n/ c; l' s! USiH4(g) ! Si(s) + 2H2(g).
A. D$ l2 i8 Q( \. n! ]2 yHigh-temperature reduction reactions where hydrogen gas is used as a reducing6 D5 u/ G0 B" [: U) f1 a
agent are also employed to produce epitaxial growth of Si ¯lms on, j! T6 ?0 G1 Y
monocrystalline Si substrates at 1200 ◦C according to the reaction/ Z7 f2 y9 P g& y6 e* Y% y" ]0 ]
SiCl4(g) + 2H2(g) ! Si(s) + 4HCl(g).# l. k. P/ K- t
The nature of epitaxy is described in detail later in this chapter.
2 Q, b, {$ g. |! F# E& a9 M9 ^) UIn CVD, as in PVD, vapor supersaturation a®ects the nucleation rate- y: y1 S: z9 D5 `9 C0 j
of the ¯lm whereas substrate temperature in°uences the rate of ¯lm growth.' u5 u+ a) @! j- p
These two factors together in°uence the extent of epitaxy, grain size, grain
) }, l9 z h( N' {' Y; R' C! B$ Kshape and texture. Low gas supersaturation and high substrate temperatures! o% j5 K3 G: |4 v4 W
promote the growth of single crystal ¯lms on substrates. High gas+ u% u6 J/ x8 `- ?* L
supersaturation and low substrate temperatures result in the growth of less
# R6 K' Y; F% F2 U9 V; Scoherent, and possibly amorphous, ¯lms. Low-pressure CVD (LPCVD),5 Z% y4 B. O+ f& A- `0 K) c
plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD), laser-enhanced CVD (LECVD) and metalorganic% r( L" s# \6 u5 d+ l$ X; F* n6 ?; x
CVD (MOCVD) are variants of the CVD process used in many
$ b, {, b) X) csituations to achieve particular objectives.
6 Y* h# K2 `' D/ {12 Introduction and Overview
' ^+ x. w7 P4 x8 H. [0 c+ H1.2.3 Thermal spray deposition' r- U: _2 V9 N2 \" k
powder injection1 j5 d) N# Y! v) @3 r/ o$ Q
internal external
; V8 u3 n; I2 N! Iwater
* |9 ]5 j. i2 V; g. |cooling! ?: i2 }0 H& X Z8 s
spray
8 i3 {; P4 X, S6 R7 ttorch7 L& @% R& [+ x7 m: ~4 H
plasma gases: F3 k3 K$ K4 G
particles in flight in, l8 k2 [+ v$ N) x% a H# s2 a, U
molten, semimolten,. F. E) S5 n2 b. o# A+ H: u
or solid state
8 W1 w# e: r$ L. ], | Hsubstrate
% o4 J' P+ a* t& p- D5 _ lair or vacuum chamber$ Y- ^" f7 t: U' J
Fig. 1.5. Schematic illustration of the thermal spray process.
0 @# |& Q+ L, q6 d5 B' k% A2 `The thermal spray process of thin ¯lm fabrication refers broadly to a
, F+ Y) _( G Q7 g8 a- X$ H; n4 O4 ]range of deposition conditions wherein a stream of molten particles impinges3 ^( B: i: U! ^: y
onto a growth surface. In this process, which is illustrated schematically in5 ~8 p4 }' [+ j2 [) }: S# n2 o
Figure 1.5, a thermal plasma arc or a combustion °ame is used to melt and
0 T0 v5 l- z, g7 K1 F- Uaccelerate particles of metals, ceramics, polymers or their composites to high/ L4 s9 Y5 N! x7 T
velocities in a directed stream toward the substrate. The sudden deceleration
) s: Z5 B$ E! O* b9 Zof a particle upon impact at the growth surface leads to lateral spreading and
! d2 `" x, C# z5 ]rapid solidi¯cation of the particle forming a `splat' in a very short time. The/ N: t: Y. g/ n7 W
characteristics of the splat are determined by the size, chemistry, velocity,. f! `/ n1 [4 p' C. N' @& w; i+ r0 Q
degree of melting and angle of impact of the impinging droplets, and by the% u2 S, J' v8 g; u3 H
temperature, composition and roughness of the substrate surface. Successive
4 l8 O& h0 o$ nimpingement of the droplets leads to the formation of a lamellar structure8 ~$ e9 V, ^4 ~# J& j
in the deposit. The oxidation of particles during thermal spray of metals( D1 ^8 @3 f: v" n5 ]6 h
also results in pores and contaminants along the splat boundaries. Quench
% P) I1 a! u6 o+ o+ ~stresses and thermal mismatch stresses in the deposit are partially relieved
! r8 u! y/ m; N$ lby the formation of microcracks or pores along the inter-splat boundaries3 B: `3 e6 O0 c3 g* c5 t" p/ J% f
and by plastic yielding or creep of the deposited material. There are several/ w% N' C4 m5 V5 a
di®erent types of thermal spray processes, a review of which can be found
- C& a& h) w& o( Ein Herman et al. (2000).
3 _0 d k8 i; n3 c9 `1 A0 kContinuous or step-wise gradients in composition through the thickness
7 _( x0 \ o+ Y8 D# Mof the layer can be achieved by use of multiple nozzles whereby the* W/ n: i' c; D2 u J, o) M% _ b
1.2 Film deposition methods 13
& U W' F8 [# T. B% u2 K' yFig. 1.6. Scanning electron micrographs showing the microstructures of plasmaspray
' ?% p/ Q. `; Q$ a5 V+ xcoating of NiCrAlY on a 1020 steel substrate. (a) Air plasma spray coated1 i B9 ?# b* l/ B; ?$ f
layer with inter-splat cracks whose origin can be traced to the oxidation of Al in
6 N$ Z4 V; g5 |3 Othe coated material during deposition. (b) Vacuum plasma sprayed coating of the
# f' S) d4 X" C/ o) @same material without inter-splat microcracks. Reproduced with permission from4 @* T; z: k" g4 n8 t0 Y; Y
Alcala et al. (2001).)2 l7 r+ ]/ v2 u u7 |) I0 e
°ow rate of the constituent phases of the deposited composite can be modulated. V4 ~% a! t7 p8 I. x$ o# i
during spray, as demonstrated by Kesler et al. (1997). Alternatively,
& x8 K$ K, t6 P/ x! }7 @, g! @3 Sthe feed rate of the powders of the di®erent constituent phases can also
) t3 [/ k; ^7 g; w3 Z. o7 Nbe controlled appropriately during thermal spray so as to deposit a graded
, ~& f+ o6 y/ E8 x( Xlayer onto a substrate. Gradients in porosity can be introduced through the* I e6 c/ T) G
thickness of the deposited layer by manipulating the processing parameters
0 z! p9 p" ^+ D9 \: c k4 Xand deposition conditions.4 B U- ]+ P& W2 F$ ^: z5 l( e
The plasma spray technique o®ers a straightforward and cost-e®ective
5 r1 H' C7 Z% z Z: dmeans to spray deposits of metals and ceramics that are tens to hundreds of
/ n9 J/ g/ ~0 P; j& Lmicrometers in thickness onto a variety of substrates in applications involving
A8 Y" Y5 s- W7 h" `0 M: Zthermal-barrier or insulator coatings. Typical plasma-spray deposits are4 F9 g8 w2 T D$ Z
porous, with only 85{90% of theoretical density.4 H* h$ e- Y% W& @' z; f
14 Introduction and Overview
6 C( F D4 i# } S' jFor applications requiring higher density coatings with a strong adhesion
% H5 j5 I4 h' X5 T0 c: J1 Yto the substrate, low-pressure plasma spray is employed where spraying- m; j. _. \: H1 w5 P# ]2 Q
is done in an inert-gas container operating at a reduced pressure. Vacuum
; q8 w$ D; V- l& Q/ I* fplasma spray is another thermal spray process which is used to improve
8 n4 `/ P1 O# Epurity of the deposited material and to reduce porosity and defect content,4 U, u' K: b4 S. S0 `, x6 }
albeit at a higher cost than air plasma spray.1 o' V7 s9 R$ {. T8 x
Figure 1.6(a) is a representative micrograph of the cross-section of an
/ @, j3 o# R/ s$ w, vair-plasma-sprayed NiCrAlY coating, commonly used as a bondcoat between
( C4 U7 Y3 j- w- I6 w. ba ceramic thermal barrier coating and a nickel-base superalloy substrate in
4 p6 `% [: |1 k+ _gas turbine engines, as described in the example in the next subsection. This
( N' c/ G6 h& Z0 qcoating was deposited onto a 1020 steel substrate. The dark streaks are
" l6 v/ z8 x: G! H$ F: Xthe inter-splat boundaries along which microcracks and voids have formed./ ]5 z3 }$ l+ N0 z
The origins of these defects could be traced to the formation of Al2O3 during
. m+ \# ?4 \( ]- {5 J' p) ^deposition (Alcala et al. 2001). On the other hand, vacuum plasma) w/ m. F; L' F6 l
spray deposition of the same material onto the steel substrate results in the; w) A% A- S: y. R
suppression of such oxidation and the attendant cracking of the inter-splat( z- i' }% c1 U) ]7 g* J
boundaries, as shown in Figure 1.6(b). The resulting coating has a more' x. I2 I7 s* S4 J; @; @
uniform microstructure with a signi¯cantly reduced pore density. |
|