找回密码
 注册
查看: 1371|回复: 0

薄膜资料(Thin film Material)连续送第4部分!

[复制链接]
发表于 2006-5-5 19:55:24 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
1.2 Film deposition methods7 m& B8 [* O3 h7 ?& x! j, ^; M
Physical vapor deposition (PVD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) are
7 A( O# n3 w; N* r8 I9 qthe most common methods for transferring material atom by atom from
! i# i8 V5 ^. r" _5 tone or more sources to the growth surface of a ¯lm being deposited onto5 R8 F' u: o9 L3 _' O( `6 o' m& J/ f
a substrate. Vapor deposition describes any process in which a solid immersed6 i( o$ }' C1 x
in a vapor becomes larger in mass due to transference of material  F; `  L: B6 w% ^' Y# j5 I
from the vapor onto the solid surface. The deposition is normally carried
% `  |; `" r# U% t, M6 m/ Rout in a vacuum chamber to enable control of the vapor composition. If the
* d' M/ d( s, X1 zvapor is created by physical means without a chemical reaction, the process) W  l* I& F: f' D5 A
is classi¯ed as PVD; if the material deposited is the product of a chemical
# h/ W, Z6 A+ u' _# O" {reaction, the process is classi¯ed as CVD. Many variations of these basic0 V: e/ Q9 {  j" I- |
vapor deposition methods have been developed in e®orts to balance advantages
8 q, o! ]( e: \+ \! h* n& aand disadvantages of various strategies based on the requirements of7 Y% r  m6 W; f; z! ^
¯lm purity, structural quality, the rate of growth, temperature constraints: x, A( Q4 u* I5 O. B" H& d  V
1.2 Film deposition methods 78 ~* c; C. m; {4 e% m8 m: I: A
source
+ v* [" R% t: _0 x4 {base
; ?3 I. f! N$ K8 Mpressure, Pb
& d$ ^8 k& [  n) T5 O8 v- b! B. Wh5 O9 [1 X# D' I9 @: I* o
substrate
4 y, {7 l+ {3 u+ \3 K0 _9 F2 v6 HTs
6 J5 y# c0 p0 ^& j5 }0 Fθ
; K  {' v5 |$ N) t* r( ?0 b. s. gvacuum/ P) W  N+ B7 g$ Z' x
Fig. 1.2. Schematic showing the basic features of evaporative deposition system.8 L+ C# Z2 y  S+ L/ D
and other factors. In this section, the salient features of these processing
9 ^  {0 U; z) s, L: X; E9 O# ^" vmethods are brie°y described. This is of general interest because the state
. J' a7 _& A) Y( q% uof stress in a ¯lm can be strongly in°uenced by its deposition history, as, ^9 i2 |  U" n& G  Q" g
described in the later sections of this chapter.8 k% Q& Z& g  E( |4 Q0 [/ f# m
1.2.1 Physical vapor deposition5 Q0 V6 t# l7 T4 ^4 S3 {& ?% O
Physical vapor deposition is a technique whereby physical processes, such
# Q* d4 D5 v0 Q) v* F) qas evaporation, sublimation or ionic impingement on a target, facilitate the
" n3 ]7 Y7 {' j) `2 n$ [" I7 Q& Rtransfer of atoms from a solid or molten source onto a substrate. Evaporation1 E/ p; x( w& L$ b) X) r  y
and sputtering are the two most widely used PVD methods for depositing. \5 T: S" A6 X0 S! w; N
¯lms./ D/ j1 N2 E2 I. b5 L% T1 m( U6 \
Figure 1.2 schematically illustrates the basic features of evaporative
; |; i/ B$ o9 pdeposition. In this process, thermal energy is supplied to a source from which
+ k2 h9 d7 [( B5 T, L+ I( catoms are evaporated for deposition onto a substrate. The vapor source con-
8 m2 I1 b3 S% Y¯guration is intended to concentrate heat near the source material and to
3 A4 M% V9 X7 b1 Navoid heeding the surroundings. Heating of the source material can be accomplished* H0 [5 v" U" M
by any of several methods. The simplest is resistance heating of# n. R% F6 m  t6 K3 m+ V# U3 q
a wire or stripe of refractory metal to which the material to be evaporated
# I- V9 O1 l! ^; ]+ y! kis attached. Larger volumes of source material can be heated in crucibles
& n, N4 q9 f6 W4 F# d) ^of refractory metals, oxides or carbon by resistance heating, high frequency
6 C* v# s' l$ f. Vinduction heating, or electron beam evaporation. The evaporated atoms
; H, r( H9 R  s& x) q2 e+ y* ptravel through reduced background pressure p in the evaporation chamber; N& X' _1 M7 s6 K0 Y2 \
and condense on the growth surface. The deposition rate _R of the ¯lm is
  A, f. O5 X! K: |" n6 I5 fcommonly denoted by the number of atoms arriving at the substrate per
$ K: |2 X" [, k3 l3 J& }) ^8 Introduction and Overview
* o0 r4 [- v  ?" Z6 junit area of the substrate per unit time, by the time required to deposit% [9 s9 I# |2 P8 ?
a full atomic layer of ¯lm material, or by the average normal speed of the
# Q" D! x. S6 A/ ugrowth surface of the ¯lm. The deposition rate or °ux is a function of the2 n' k; Z5 {1 J5 r8 S6 ~1 q; `
travel distance from the source to the substrate, the angle of impingement+ d2 b. t$ x, C  O3 t; f
onto the substrate surface, the substrate temperature Ts, and the base pressure: W* Z. p* h' E5 a- ^0 N
p. If the source material (such as Cr, Fe, Mo, Si and Ti) undergoes, c) ]9 \9 A+ E4 I- P0 k* Q& ?
sublimation, su±ciently large vapor pressures may be obtained below its
6 Z' H5 j" D1 I4 f# _1 smelting temperature so that a solid source could be employed for evaporative! S" _6 R$ ]& _" B2 A* o5 G
deposition. On the other hand, for most metals in which a su±ciently
5 e. ^/ A5 C) X6 W. l- c& }large vapor pressure (» 10−3 torr, or 0.13 Pa) cannot be achieved at or
, m. N6 F2 ]+ jbelow the melting temperature, the source is heated to a liquid state so as7 w* p: M3 B3 {4 C+ q! {, H
to achieve proper deposition conditions.; y. V6 o, F6 A1 A" R/ Y- e) K+ ^, w
Metal alloys, such as Al{Cu, Co{Cr or Ni{Cr, can generally be evaporated8 d* F' ~6 J) x% t$ h3 A6 E
directly from a single heated source. If two constituents of the alloy
5 G  v- U0 B& {  G( L# B( ^( Eevaporate at di®erent rates causing the composition to change in the melt,; ~# p) x( R4 b) H* T
two di®erent sources held at di®erent temperatures may be employed to6 l9 ?# L* W7 ~- F/ |+ }! s1 j
ensure uniform deposition. Unlike metals and alloys, inorganic compounds( f, c3 |/ O- ^8 e( w. |# v; w9 U
evaporate in such a way that the vapor composition is usually di®erent from
" O- s) v' i1 ]: @8 f0 G9 n# qthat of the source. The resulting molecular structure causes the ¯lm stoichiometry+ V/ [9 j2 c, U! `2 m3 n
to be di®erent from that of the source. High purity ¯lms of& [" p4 a9 ?& M# ]
virtually all materials can be deposited in vacuum by means of electron
/ v1 T1 `0 g8 g# f1 s' l, Y8 xbeam evaporation.0 C" u" I3 b7 S7 [4 ^$ `
Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) is an example of an evaporative method.
. `  M, w" d* `- n8 {, dThis growth technique can provide ¯lm materials of extraordinarily good
9 h8 C* t( x: K! y5 X! y- G% Rquality which are ideal for research purposes. However, the rate of growth
' u- h( I4 r* {# A) Q! {9 O0 gis very low compared to other methods, which makes it of limited use for9 G  u, N. Q7 e+ M7 C/ b
production of devices. In MBE, the deposition of a thin ¯lm can be accurately
& G" m) M5 A6 J6 {% Econtrolled at the atomic level in an ultra-high vacuum (10−10 torr, or7 w; [2 \( R7 f- v. t
1.33£10−8 Pa). A substrate wafer is placed in the ultra-high vacuum chamber.
. B  B: T2 C' {0 f# |) r5 m8 GIt is sputtered brie°y with a low energy ion beam to remove surface- U; u. x1 I4 h' K
contamination. This step is followed by a high temperature anneal to relax
6 [: Z8 V7 c# o1 N& W, Tany damage done to the growth surface during preparation. The substrate# F1 {/ B7 _1 Z/ I+ Q
is then cooled to the growth temperature, typically between 400 and 700 ◦C,
/ V4 K' ?# \, Y# y, kand growth commences by directing atomic beams of the ¯lm material, as
# F7 b7 M5 l9 m" B  C$ E! i! f6 gwell as a beam of dopant material if necessary, toward the growth surface of, q, q( b7 n5 k5 @0 y/ e! G$ {/ M
the substrate. The beams are emitted from crucibles of the growth materials
6 Y2 c- I4 c& C  v5 f4 Y) M8 @, ?8 xwhich have been heated to temperatures well above the substrate temperature1 @- V( K# O4 y
to induce evaporation and condensation. The ¯lms may be examined* K9 j3 V! I+ m3 r8 o( w
by transmission electron microscopy or x-ray di®raction after cooling. The+ T" ]7 [9 s) @1 Q
complete history of evolution of internal stress in the ¯lm during deposi1.2, R) [' X; ]8 c9 V4 z0 V
Film deposition methods 9: g, e' N% \9 n: l, u6 q$ M& [1 I
tion can be obtained in situ by monitoring the changes in curvature of the2 O' f4 k3 O' s8 I7 _/ i5 l
substrate on which the ¯lm is deposited as described in detail in Chapter 2.
: Q7 P! G3 }) k" S- h1 ovacuum Ar
( N' M: d9 M* P, A- M* n5 _# qSput t er. u% ?" U) w, [; ]
gas$ w0 g% G# n+ E2 l; Q5 o* d3 h
t arget) a- M* P' E0 i' s1 A5 D
(cathode). K; ^/ c# i0 o/ _" r* Y" m8 j6 x  J; R
subst rat e
3 e7 d: d3 x* j+ C5 V* u(anode)
* C3 q- |) |. |9 \7 K) R/ e+ bglow discharge (Ar+)9 x+ q, B6 \+ X3 K4 z7 M/ x
DC) n/ h: L6 I1 f& J- R& _0 ]
volt age
& M9 ]. h3 B- h! k+ I  i' @  Isource (or)( k# q6 T' B/ O& x7 y- l
Fig. 1.3. Schematic showing the basic features of a dc sputter deposition system.# F$ a0 f/ `( Z1 w5 ~$ i& B
In sputter deposition, ions of a sputtering gas, typically Ar, are accelerated8 L3 g9 u; F+ ?  ^7 D
toward the target at high speed by an imposed electric ¯eld. The initial
7 P" s9 A; n! Z) Z: V% ?* Tconcentration of charge carriers in the system is signi¯cantly increased
, `* D: E( J' u- {% l& dwith an increase in the dc voltage, as the ions collide with the cathode,0 M$ q/ Q: m0 L" K6 e1 n  J
thereby releasing secondary electrons, and with the neutral gas atoms. As. K, ~, e5 [$ t, V: c, i
critical numbers of electrons and ions are created through such avalanches,
, Y" e+ M1 J8 dthe gas begins to glow and the discharge becomes self-sustaining. Gaseous
* I5 b  h9 V. }% m2 Eions striking the target or the source material from which the ¯lm is made
1 d: v- @7 `* _1 v/ `$ o* I' Mdislodge surface atoms which form the vapor in the chamber. The target is* V" K; t- d$ c# N# `
referred to as the cathode since it is connected to the negative side of the, a% ]9 t' F, x7 y- V
direct current power supply. Figure 1.3 schematically shows the basic elements- e; R3 {5 r& x* j
of a sputter deposition system. The chamber is evacuated and then
, w( o& u8 ~  eAr gas, at a pressure of approximately 13.3 Pa (10−1 torr), is introduced for
: ^* j& E0 x% R( T% h# T! Uthe purpose of maintaining a visible glow discharge. The Ar+ ions bombard4 H: N8 ?1 j6 J7 [0 Y
the target or cathode, and the ensuing momentum transfer causes the neu10
% n* O# ~6 a2 R( @4 `, r4 Z9 q' bIntroduction and Overview& N/ N/ @+ I  h
tral atoms of the target source to be dislodged. These atoms transit through
1 T! A7 c' i- g% ^7 |the discharge and condense onto the substrate, thus providing ¯lm growth.
0 J7 T; S2 N2 |& }& R- E4 OSeveral di®erent sputtering methods are widely used for the deposition" }6 L; W! h+ w8 j- s
of thin ¯lms in di®erent practical applications: (i) dc sputtering (also
& r- M4 W( }& ]' f7 ~commonly referred to as cathodic or diode sputtering), (ii) radio frequency
. z" m* h1 J8 D5 O  @(rf) sputtering with frequencies typically in the 5{30 MHz range, (iii) magnetron
1 \7 R8 n8 p/ psputtering, where a magnetic ¯eld is applied in superposition with a8 }6 H! q. w5 N' ?9 ^$ S; {0 ~
parallel or perpendicularly oriented electric ¯eld between the substrate and
2 c. o* }8 X5 P/ H4 o( [1 othe target source, and (iv) bias sputtering, where either a negative dc or rf
2 s6 p6 C. k2 e8 B7 Obias voltage is applied to the substrate so as to vary the energy and °ux of
- ^3 X7 }. y, gthe incident charged species.
; I; s$ a: ^$ X, Q% T+ c9 q8 @There are many distinctions between the sputtering process and the1 @( r' p% v! X9 p
evaporative process for ¯lm deposition, as described by Ohring (1992) for
. b0 j/ m  r. t* ~7 yexample. Evaporation is a thermal process where the atoms of the material3 Q2 X4 D1 s5 H' ]" E/ u: ^
to be deposited arrive at the growth surface with a low kinetic energy. In
2 p; ^% ^0 S* c/ ~sputtering, on the other hand, the bombardment of the target source by Ar+
4 |: _% j5 [& S. H1 d7 N9 Kions imparts a high kinetic energy to the expelled source atoms. Although
8 x) Y& ]( v) ^$ x. M* Z  Q' }sputter deposition promotes high surface di®usivity of arriving atoms, it9 J( s% R8 ?' g2 R- M! C
also leads to greater defect nucleation and damage at the deposition surface" c- ~6 L, f  i0 Z5 l$ u
because of the high energy of the atoms. While evaporation occurs in a
7 F% C' J9 y( z5 k) `high vacuum (10−6 to 10−10 torr, or 1.33£10−4 to 1.33£10−8 Pa), sputtered
0 W3 Y7 _* p0 u0 k/ W1 |atoms transit through a high pressure discharge zone with a pressure. A; y: ?4 i" Y
of approximately 0.1 torr (13.33 Pa). Sputter-deposited ¯lms generally contain
$ x7 ], g2 _" O- |  L0 qa higher concentration of impurity atoms than do ¯lms deposited by* w0 k$ B7 Z' c
evaporation, and are prone to contamination by the sputtering gas. As a
! K4 K' K# D0 a; [2 |% k8 wresult, sputter deposition is not well suited for epitaxial growth of ¯lms.
2 a1 I& N& d& V; w! `4 jFor polycrystalline ¯lms, the ¯lm grain structure resulting from sputter/ V! c) |! B; F; H% n! \$ b; U$ {% v
deposition typically has many crystallographic orientations without preferred
5 E5 x& j) a5 b- e" |& stexture. However, evaporative deposition leads to highly textured
3 f1 G9 _- t& M2 ^* L  T¯lms for which the grain size is typically greater than that of the sputtered
$ ?1 x2 x9 w3 u9 }- O. R: e¯lms. Sputter deposition o®ers better control in maintaining stoichiometry' B- Z' m7 x2 W3 i; G) z; o) |7 K
and ¯lm thickness uniformity than evaporative deposition, and has the °exibility8 v0 [( y: R; d' Y
to deposit essentially any crystalline and amorphous materials. These* t5 [& `0 @1 j, O+ V1 b
issues are discussed in more detail in Section 1.8.2 B2 }! q( g/ V9 s$ x: T9 r1 [& B
1.2.2 Chemical vapor deposition
9 P) q3 D" Y3 C3 AChemical vapor deposition is a versatile deposition technique that provides
0 h, C4 D$ d0 o; X4 `/ l$ fa means of growing thin ¯lms of elemental and compound semiconductors,
( J, N- G* W7 v- H% }7 x1 Nmetal alloys and amorphous or crystalline compounds of di®erent stoichiom1.2$ p' K, w2 e! t1 c% I2 Z3 n% P1 F7 b
Film deposition methods 11
) c4 d: S7 P& i( [: t    / e3 O/ o: O5 [! b
 
8 k6 H. G# s; L . I- J5 S! w* z! {, ~! ?, t3 u
 " d. P  ]2 ]3 @6 F3 A2 F
) M* @1 z0 S  @4 b0 V9 V

- s9 B9 c. T" N) J# n
3 m& R( a5 w6 z$ V6 g 6 ?/ J: Y3 r6 T% j. G; |
( {$ Z9 N. o4 J9 k

6 y& x! }7 M# C/ j6 g  B" n0 |' |' S: Y
        0 I. l# e( Q: n. L  X, S$ z- ~
      
9 A4 a- l( s# U8 t. t    
' Y1 W3 p4 ]8 m  }
% W2 e0 Y# n, Y: u/ Y7 O$ s
7 j7 |6 M6 H' C  |; Q      
* H! f9 r& G: J% a$ P2 r1 W& T# ?8 C  H5 ~$ e
!
" ^4 a5 I! H- M5 iFig. 1.4. Schematic showing the basic features of an open reactor system for chemical+ \: h$ O- T' e& m4 @
vapor deposition.* C2 w$ ]8 v( i& m0 ~
etry. The basic principle underlying this method is a chemical reaction between+ s% o( [1 M1 h0 d# e# N
a volatile compound of the material from which the ¯lm is to be made, u6 z. q, G( a* o5 t1 ^( ]
with other suitable gases so as to facilitate the atomic deposition of a nonvolatile
  {8 }$ c4 d9 d( C5 v, m  fsolid ¯lm on a substrate, as indicated schematically in Figure 1.4.% W7 c$ r& G0 g; ?& Q6 |, k
The chemical reaction in a CVD process may involve pyrolysis or reduction.* j5 ^9 z: F+ ?' c: ~1 n
Consider the production of amorphous or polycrystalline Si ¯lms on
4 A  F. U  g) m- z- MSi substrates, where pyrolysis at 650 ◦C leads to the decomposition of silane: n+ O8 b8 _$ U- H1 U
gas according to the reaction
$ c- d! o1 y* d( DSiH4(g) ! Si(s) + 2H2(g).
6 F  F- F% ]7 W& C9 q: J8 `2 Z) uHigh-temperature reduction reactions where hydrogen gas is used as a reducing
- Y1 a3 t, G- p( c& ?agent are also employed to produce epitaxial growth of Si ¯lms on! ~) y: |. m- u: ?  u
monocrystalline Si substrates at 1200 ◦C according to the reaction0 \( q" e' i4 D; \& D; R3 b) ^
SiCl4(g) + 2H2(g) ! Si(s) + 4HCl(g).
: \* e8 e# u$ V% E; j) X$ uThe nature of epitaxy is described in detail later in this chapter./ x% \3 {5 V$ D& k$ y" O
In CVD, as in PVD, vapor supersaturation a®ects the nucleation rate# {/ r  s; {  [# W7 `
of the ¯lm whereas substrate temperature in°uences the rate of ¯lm growth.  N8 Q% ?0 k* e8 {* \% n
These two factors together in°uence the extent of epitaxy, grain size, grain  y( u9 n8 x+ [% z! K( r
shape and texture. Low gas supersaturation and high substrate temperatures+ b  D. ]5 G# I/ \+ Q: h$ O
promote the growth of single crystal ¯lms on substrates. High gas
6 I: B5 Y* z6 v" a" V0 Isupersaturation and low substrate temperatures result in the growth of less
' V. d$ a) W; ^coherent, and possibly amorphous, ¯lms. Low-pressure CVD (LPCVD),* c' Y, l$ F$ C. N# G
plasma-enhanced CVD (PECVD), laser-enhanced CVD (LECVD) and metalorganic: s& w/ H& a; Q) ~' i- F% d
CVD (MOCVD) are variants of the CVD process used in many
8 l  b. Q; H* {3 Jsituations to achieve particular objectives.0 t- z; d& B. q; G/ a0 H
12 Introduction and Overview7 l$ W: U3 p- N* Q  b, y3 X
1.2.3 Thermal spray deposition* \/ ~! r7 t0 _2 |# Q* A
powder injection
2 }: k( @) g7 J) ^7 s, t8 o# ^# Ninternal external2 d, n9 c# N7 _! u! q( q; ~
water1 K2 R. v; J" B0 X: J3 y/ F
cooling; f( v9 h0 j- H" H0 ]
spray
; Z$ ]& w  b6 Itorch1 K, p, @4 G8 T0 Z9 `7 X$ ?) L
plasma gases8 c1 A' ?" K7 J- o
particles in flight in
8 Y# {6 J7 g" p" K; t  Smolten, semimolten,7 O/ Y" Q2 t5 Y5 e
or solid state) S- h0 y( r& l0 ]8 b
substrate
! H, W! d  P9 \- l) q/ M! |' s. `air or vacuum chamber
3 h4 j; q, [! xFig. 1.5. Schematic illustration of the thermal spray process.. @: e1 S+ z) H  [. N
The thermal spray process of thin ¯lm fabrication refers broadly to a' p% a  \, g6 @% ~
range of deposition conditions wherein a stream of molten particles impinges4 f. M5 b# e7 w/ I4 H  Z% o, u
onto a growth surface. In this process, which is illustrated schematically in
4 B9 P' C# m/ C# d$ n: fFigure 1.5, a thermal plasma arc or a combustion °ame is used to melt and
5 f% X1 d  s$ f8 {" L+ gaccelerate particles of metals, ceramics, polymers or their composites to high
. P; p" z: r3 |velocities in a directed stream toward the substrate. The sudden deceleration( w, W. {: \3 ]2 n0 p
of a particle upon impact at the growth surface leads to lateral spreading and
  S- W) x6 z7 x- u( f" Vrapid solidi¯cation of the particle forming a `splat' in a very short time. The3 B1 @/ a+ p  N
characteristics of the splat are determined by the size, chemistry, velocity,
# r$ w5 N8 \' P1 Ldegree of melting and angle of impact of the impinging droplets, and by the
, ]; c; ?0 x# w% E: |% U! {temperature, composition and roughness of the substrate surface. Successive* E) y/ }+ T1 j! c. q# _# x
impingement of the droplets leads to the formation of a lamellar structure2 x1 n+ S7 Z$ W2 A
in the deposit. The oxidation of particles during thermal spray of metals
: q2 j: B- A" @$ }( h" Kalso results in pores and contaminants along the splat boundaries. Quench7 ?4 l. k1 `! F. X. D1 W
stresses and thermal mismatch stresses in the deposit are partially relieved
" B& i3 V9 b9 k3 I# wby the formation of microcracks or pores along the inter-splat boundaries+ E2 [3 d3 h* L! u8 y6 F
and by plastic yielding or creep of the deposited material. There are several9 g/ y+ M0 F% k5 V  m
di®erent types of thermal spray processes, a review of which can be found+ W6 u: n3 ?" d1 [
in Herman et al. (2000).
8 C0 j; V1 b* W, Z8 b0 T( o4 TContinuous or step-wise gradients in composition through the thickness$ i- }$ y. J" B/ p# |  o2 n
of the layer can be achieved by use of multiple nozzles whereby the& a+ C% R: Z0 J* S7 j
1.2 Film deposition methods 13
3 @' O9 a4 r4 U. nFig. 1.6. Scanning electron micrographs showing the microstructures of plasmaspray5 d: e3 A5 Q1 E
coating of NiCrAlY on a 1020 steel substrate. (a) Air plasma spray coated) H* k0 w- P1 Q5 ^* M0 T
layer with inter-splat cracks whose origin can be traced to the oxidation of Al in
/ ?+ r% T; O& _) s% Qthe coated material during deposition. (b) Vacuum plasma sprayed coating of the
% f8 p' y  R5 V# w8 R$ E+ @same material without inter-splat microcracks. Reproduced with permission from
# ?9 y8 Y' ^4 d$ W6 V( e/ L- qAlcala et al. (2001).)
) a8 j, S3 O  h; [# G' k' A: `°ow rate of the constituent phases of the deposited composite can be modulated
2 @/ c% X! H2 ?% v$ Oduring spray, as demonstrated by Kesler et al. (1997). Alternatively,0 d6 _! h; r! `  t+ m0 |
the feed rate of the powders of the di®erent constituent phases can also8 ^5 \% J% T7 d
be controlled appropriately during thermal spray so as to deposit a graded
$ P% @: N! h" o; A) Y6 i3 G7 Jlayer onto a substrate. Gradients in porosity can be introduced through the: L+ c+ Y' H# r) E  W
thickness of the deposited layer by manipulating the processing parameters5 H2 o* w; g8 ?5 [. i
and deposition conditions.0 x( a2 R% p) q& m8 M9 e3 P
The plasma spray technique o®ers a straightforward and cost-e®ective1 z2 X4 E/ F/ j& R: C; b, b
means to spray deposits of metals and ceramics that are tens to hundreds of, U8 I4 Y7 f5 j/ I7 o3 d
micrometers in thickness onto a variety of substrates in applications involving( f+ [: s6 |* W4 ~6 I7 q) c/ ]
thermal-barrier or insulator coatings. Typical plasma-spray deposits are4 s0 W( F( F9 Q8 L% C
porous, with only 85{90% of theoretical density./ ^& L  m: L8 T; u0 M/ W
14 Introduction and Overview
# K/ {+ C% I' U- s4 v) dFor applications requiring higher density coatings with a strong adhesion0 h% c0 b3 X) ]' p4 ?* l4 t, q, h
to the substrate, low-pressure plasma spray is employed where spraying. }  Y0 _1 y. y5 b2 P4 s- |
is done in an inert-gas container operating at a reduced pressure. Vacuum
. e, F/ Y/ g, K9 d- q. `8 g+ Dplasma spray is another thermal spray process which is used to improve  g, N  S  i! K
purity of the deposited material and to reduce porosity and defect content,
9 C' n; x$ I( Ualbeit at a higher cost than air plasma spray.
( D1 o6 x) o$ D- L2 i9 C$ b: u9 O7 XFigure 1.6(a) is a representative micrograph of the cross-section of an' t9 h) z* P9 p( Q' }2 b
air-plasma-sprayed NiCrAlY coating, commonly used as a bondcoat between
$ w) l% U- ?" h" O& d* s; wa ceramic thermal barrier coating and a nickel-base superalloy substrate in2 M1 Z$ x: a& Z( I/ L
gas turbine engines, as described in the example in the next subsection. This
9 I0 V& b* P7 T2 a8 E1 rcoating was deposited onto a 1020 steel substrate. The dark streaks are3 i7 F& y2 l# _- n; l% s
the inter-splat boundaries along which microcracks and voids have formed.2 k1 o) X  j. ?- w* `8 A2 T
The origins of these defects could be traced to the formation of Al2O3 during; E4 \5 v, R) F) `# r" x; u
deposition (Alcala et al. 2001). On the other hand, vacuum plasma+ {% q; i' ?' R5 L$ K: ~' E+ Q; }
spray deposition of the same material onto the steel substrate results in the3 l- r/ o7 |$ B% n6 C
suppression of such oxidation and the attendant cracking of the inter-splat( r6 b% E# C; S% f( c
boundaries, as shown in Figure 1.6(b). The resulting coating has a more
9 P' z' ?1 P+ o% n, X4 auniform microstructure with a signi¯cantly reduced pore density.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|光学薄膜论坛

GMT, 2026-10-26 , Processed in 0.022386 second(s), 25 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

© 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表