找回密码
 注册
查看: 1345|回复: 0

薄膜资料(Thin film Material)连续送第3部分! Introduction and Overview

[复制链接]
发表于 2006-3-11 19:12:44 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
1, K) ^) x* m5 e6 }) E0 t( s
Introduction and Overview
& p. W2 q" ]; b( u3 tThin solid ¯lms have been used in many types of engineering systems and
9 i: C. _1 i0 m  ehave been adapted to ful¯ll a wide variety of functions. A few examples5 L) P! ^4 {6 w& b  J0 @9 N
follow.
- O/ P% ]# a9 w5 d* [) K. R/ a2 B1 `¡ Great strides in thin ¯lm technology have been made in order to
* f) m( ]5 A( O: Y8 Dadvance the rapid development of miniature, highly integrated electronic
. Z" e2 v4 k3 U" ]0 B8 P7 fcircuits. In such devices, con¯nement of electric charge relies8 H9 @6 j2 Z4 m9 w( }; s
largely on interfaces between materials with di®ering electronic properties.
9 W# i* I  w) m0 d$ _6 Q9 KFurthermore, the need for thin materials of exceptionally high1 D0 A6 t6 V; k4 e- ^7 {) s! j! S
quality, reproducible characteristics and reliability has driven ¯lm
9 b6 T4 \$ F# }5 y$ r9 f! Ngrowth technology through a rapid succession of signi¯cant achievements.
% j( w& m: J; m6 qMore recently, progress in the physics of material structures
: ~# ~9 c8 u; G4 D9 z  X% Lthat rely on quantum con¯nement of charge carriers continues to
+ E, t/ [2 E/ e3 ]/ ?  y5 trevolutionize the area. These systems present new challenges for materials
4 i, Q1 ?$ M" F- J- m9 N  hsynthesis, characterization and modeling.
! E/ [) R% n: R9 J6 M- m  O; s! l¡ The use of surface coatings to protect structural materials in high
/ z, W7 Q/ C4 R% |( T- jtemperature environments is another thin ¯lm technology of enormous
4 `9 g+ D+ u! P- U4 @- p# ecommercial signi¯cance. In gas turbine engines, for example,
; V2 y; [9 Z0 @2 A2 D3 Xthin surface ¯lms of materials chosen for their chemical inertness,
- {7 y; y& w7 C) m& pstability at elevated temperatures and low thermal conductivity are3 Y5 R. c; a/ ?( _& x0 Y
used to increase engine e±ciency and to extend signi¯cantly the useful
! q( G1 c  d9 L; t+ q3 v6 L0 @lifetimes of the structural materials that they protect. Multilayed or0 d7 ]# O) `: w
continuously graded coatings o®er the potential for further progress! q( ^* V+ i8 [+ s% u
in this e®ort.- @+ E0 H7 {" ~# E' Z6 Z
¡ The useful lifetimes of components subjected to friction and wear due
. Q( b" H" E  H  L1 a( r5 a$ u& z! gto contact can be extended substantially through the use of surface6 y; D- b# x6 Z4 z2 d* |
1
! t; w5 `2 t$ O) T  V2 Introduction and Overview
* y+ {2 U. z/ u. ?  [0 S$ S# Scoatings or surface treatments. Among the technologies that rely on
. _5 H' ~# U4 ~. V/ q9 ethe use of thin ¯lms in this way are internal combustion engines, arti( M. \8 b/ s  K/ u+ F/ Y+ s
¯cial hip and knee implants, and computer hard disks for magnetic
- m4 n" b3 k6 j8 J- |& udata storage.
, M( T* ]5 i# ~5 U¡ Thin ¯lms are integral parts of many micro-electro-mechanical systems
5 Y! }. T% f( z7 s+ i/ udesigned to serve as sensors or actuators. For example, a piezoelectric
( f% `7 I0 \$ b( H/ T, ]or piezoresistive thin ¯lm deposited on a silicon membrane4 }" K! Q0 k3 V; T8 f# V3 x% v
can be used to detect electronically a de°ection of the membrane in0 Z4 s1 h4 w; D" R  q
response to a pressure applied on its surface or by an acceleration of, @  Q  k+ s. ~& c% k4 i
its supports. Devices based on thin ¯lm technology are used as microphones
# {+ I, a0 c, R% ~& ~- [in hearing aids, monitors of blood pressure during exercise,  n6 ]+ a5 O" I% W3 e
electronically positioned thin ¯lm mirrors on °exible supports in optical7 b3 g2 H7 u9 {8 `0 ^1 E7 V
display systems, and probes for detecting the degree of ripeness# o/ l  Z; F9 a4 `- G- `- Q7 \
of fruits.
- [6 k4 W* e9 ^% {% Q0 MNumerous other technologies rely on thin ¯lm behavior. An immediate
2 V7 D! h4 G* t( T' }observation that follows from the foregoing list is that the principal
  J3 o4 M1 y; x8 D8 o; |function of the thin ¯lm components in these applications is often not structural.  O3 K9 l7 E1 p1 ]- x# g4 M
Consequently, load carrying capacity may not be a principal consideration
" g8 e. x- \: z5 q& I, @3 Ufor design or material selection. However, fabrication of thin ¯lm
) E* q' n0 M  p" {/ Dcon¯gurations typically results in internal stress in the ¯lm of a magnitude; O" M: B: J. i! k; ^
su±cient to induce mechanical deformation, damage or failure. A tendency
7 i3 j  Y' ^' }( v9 h# ?' w2 C8 yfor stress-driven failure of a thin ¯lm structure can be a disabling barrier to7 {& C7 l, v' `. s3 Q; `' Y
incorporation of that ¯lm into a system, even when load carrying capacity
: a1 Y4 ]' C" x5 L& k$ T  E. }is of secondary importance as a functional characteristic. The presence of
5 H5 K' r/ E! n& A3 l- Tan internal stress in a thin ¯lm structure may also in°uence the electrical
% X$ C) r3 R* j5 Yor magnetic properties in functional devices.
1 E9 b% _2 s& S* I' _This chapter provides an overview of commonly used deposition and
( _$ J0 l; F7 @1 N9 wprocessing methods for the synthesis and fabrication of thin ¯lm and such
. \2 u- P5 O( q8 T! jstructures. This is followed by a discussion of the fabrication of small volume
1 P% ~- `% \: Wstructures, where examples of the basic steps involved in lithography,
  G: g4 p7 j" @: ysurface micromachining, bulk micromachining, and molding processes are9 r& x- `" q# p4 Y" {0 a
considered in the context of the manufacture of microelectronic devices,  L3 a, C5 N" K, T
as well as small structures encountered in the development of micro-electromechanical6 Y9 T- W9 Q5 k: ?6 G
systems (MEMS) and nano-electro-mechanical systems (NEMS).
; ~' w5 `* c1 H5 R# X/ I6 j- vAttention is devoted to the e®ects of processing on the nucleation and growth
3 `+ a7 M0 j) u: C5 B4 k/ Gof monocrystalline and polycrystalline thin ¯lms on substrates, the evolution
2 m8 M! D) }) `1 _2 L! iof ¯lm microstructure in polycrystalline ¯lms, and the generation of internal9 }! H: i) q6 L, ?' x" a
stresses through processing. In the chapters that follow, consequences of
- n6 y4 M" p* k) l$ x: g# I& o1.1 A classification of thin film configurations 3
4 m: D# S: C! ^6 e" y: n4 ^) Rstress in thin ¯lm and multilayer materials is studied, organized according: a7 E7 _8 d8 j: X
to the deformation or failure phenomena which can be induced by internal
' f( I% n1 s* Y; s8 }( Pstress.! M! o  F6 k$ E" `) a
1.1 A classification of thin film configurations
$ J& \6 Z' B' T3 W- E. J( P) Y( BAs a guide for the development and application of concepts that are useful
7 ?* v- [  F$ d7 T4 Gfor describing mechanical behavior of solid thin ¯lm and multilayer materials,& V( X3 q8 |0 m; E  a
it is convenient to classify structures in terms of their geometrical/ P9 W. f- E6 d( |
con¯gurations and the nature of constraint on their deformation imposed by
7 Q' l/ T) ]' R; q4 t  Y, K$ w) Ktheir surroundings. For this purpose, con¯gurations are classi¯ed in terms" M" y& T2 P+ a) f' ?
of the relative extent of the solid bodies in three orthogonal directions, with
) e  `% [: c% z* p; T; T1 Athe orientation of the reference coordinate system being dictated by the con-7 o6 Z, W% }+ n* m, o( U
¯guration. The degree of constraint is determined by the interaction of the
! J9 `( g; ~. Bthin ¯lm structure with other deformable solids to which it may be attached,
" Z2 F5 B) ]1 ^. K/ tor with which it may otherwise be in contact. The former situation requires
2 s' P' w$ p9 Q1 V% `compatibility of deformation, while the latter requires some restriction on
' E) }3 R; |* Q. I% N7 K" ?its motion. The categories of con¯guration are termed ¯lm (or layer), line
- g) V* @- X: g' X& B  k(or wire), and island (or dot); the categories of constraint are termed uncon-: f% ]( m% K2 c4 p2 |
¯ned, partially con¯ned and fully con¯ned. These classes are illustrated in
( M8 E, h1 G$ [* ^# K* NFigure 1.1. There is nothing fundamental about such a classi¯cation scheme,
# A; Z( T- d/ f5 X) H8 s3 qbut its adoption can facilitate understanding of the ranges of applicability
; `' i& ]0 m8 pof the various ideas in the ¯eld.
: m' f2 K, F4 K8 o" t" N1 UWith reference to Figure 1.1, a structure of an extent that is small in. `/ p: s$ f2 _" m  L9 o9 A
one direction compared to its extent in the other two directions is termed
1 a6 P# A& ^7 pa thin ¯lm; in structural mechanics, such con¯gurations are identi¯ed as
& I* N0 o4 T$ y# eplates or shells. The quali¯er `small' as used here means that the largest, T/ k, `4 f' u: N9 a# M
dimensions are at least twenty times greater than the small dimension, and, r1 ?0 m; ?5 O: O
more commonly are hundreds of times greater than the small dimension. A
( g2 L$ a; t6 M" _" ostructure that has small extent in two directions compared to its extent in, N' X) `# s2 c# I
the third direction is termed a line or wire; such con¯gurations are usually: A5 \( ~8 ]' S8 u: N3 A8 a4 L( ~- [# c0 Z
identi¯ed as rods or bars in structural mechanics. Lastly, a structure that4 S* ]+ Q8 `, ~3 s
has small extent in all three directions, compared to the dimensions of its# a# W% L% T! {* }+ V+ F
surroundings in this case, is termed an island or a dot.
1 {/ J8 ?8 G1 R. N7 s( ~Concerning the degree of constraint on deformation, a small structure) f3 i% j, w. I( v% n+ Z
is said to be uncon¯ned if the boundaries associated with its thin dimensions
- C) O! N# b& l' Hare free to displace without restriction. On the other hand, it is said' a! G6 y+ I. _, z, o
to be fully con¯ned if all boundaries associated with its thin dimensions are- S0 Z1 K& ]' E+ M+ l8 A
constrained against deformation. In virtually all cases, the constraint at a
/ q9 l) a5 t; m' G% Y* kboundary is due to another material which shares that boundary as a com4' \/ v+ N4 x% l3 c# Z. K, B
Introduction and Overview
7 l& a8 a) T/ m, W6 w6 k               
2 V0 E5 `9 v, |5 Y' V" {3 D2 u% A0 N 4 F3 K) E- y! o5 S; L
                                  9 w1 h& Q4 H, c) s! r
                   4 D4 B" r7 l( j( _. T/ A3 u( h# ~% y
                  8 b( P- Q5 ?9 b2 |. T
                   - U9 W  \( x0 k, \: J& h( f
/ G$ Z( s8 @1 u5 e( `+ p
Fig. 1.1. A categorization of small volume structures in terms of their general shapes
" \: C5 D- W4 L8 W* Dand levels of constraints. A ¯lm is often called a two-dimensional structure, a line/ {3 o/ U. S7 v, z  p( b0 Z6 H( X
is called a one-dimensional structure and a dot a zero-dimensional structure, but) Q, j- L2 p' [9 J/ G9 i6 V
this terminology is not standard and it varies signi¯cantly among di®erent technical2 e% u- a" T& S2 S" T7 D! Z
specialities.$ {, P" [  R# u1 k8 Q
mon interface. The structure is said to be partially con¯ned if displacement9 h' R/ ^& x/ t7 ]7 q5 P
of its boundaries associated with some, but not all, directions of thinness% J2 ?. R4 X2 v; d9 w/ E7 _
are unconstrained.4 L6 i  Q7 g( K- t9 F  t
The classi¯cation matrix in Figure 1.1 includes some illustrations of+ e- I( N8 X: i! @0 G) B1 }1 T
varying degrees of con¯nement and thinness. As a speci¯c example, consider9 V, d  o+ C0 }. B5 K
a layer of a SiGe alloy 1 ¹m in thickness, which is deposited on a 1cm by
, l5 u% K/ I  j; Z+ |1 cm area of a Si substrate that is 0:5mm thick. This con¯guration results" }) g6 n: z9 ?3 Q1 d7 T
in a partially con¯ned thin ¯lm structure. A stripe of copper with a square
7 \: ?4 \. N7 R+ jcross-section that is 0:5 ¹m on a side and a length of 5mm deposited on" J* W$ ]/ B. ~6 V8 z
a relatively thick Si substrate is a partially con¯ned line. If the surfaces
. _1 c+ n  W: q% O# K+ hof the Si substrate and the wire are then completely covered over with a
. m3 A9 M7 y9 v8 o* ]9 K! k1 ¹m thick coating of SiO2 to electronically isolate the wire, the structure$ S$ V( G' V( a! n3 v) J
becomes a fully con¯ned line. An InAs quantum dot being formed by stress
3 |, {9 T' u' t& L) j) A5 u7 g  ydriven surface di®usion is a partially con¯ned island. If this con¯guration is5 X* z/ d& `) ?0 G& Z: p, I
then covered over by a blanket deposit of AlAs, the ¯nal structure is a fully' k; f3 j7 i$ p$ ^
con¯ned island or quantum dot con¯guration.
- i' ~. m4 g, s- s' S9 g, oThe idea of the classi¯cation scheme is intended only as a conceptual
! c) z8 i* U1 jguide. There are many situations in which the structure exhibits behavior
# ?# L% N* }0 O; Qrepresented by more than one entry in the categorization matrix in Fig1.1
: D$ Q  |6 K- ^1 m% r5 oA classification of thin film configurations 5
9 l, x4 P" D; `( l  ?ure 1.1. For example, suppose that a thin ¯lm bonded to a relatively thick, v$ N) K# ]1 v$ j# Y
substrate supports a compressive stress. This is a partially con¯ned thin ¯lm
4 |2 u( i2 z* W$ k  H9 ^con¯guration. If the stress becomes large enough in magnitude, the ¯lm will
8 l5 B; u" y1 V6 e  d9 ?) n0 Ctend to buckle by debonding from the substrate over some portion of the
+ N+ R% c( r5 o% j) b4 _8 M7 B' t: pinterface and then de°ecting away from the substrate over this portion. The& _0 R7 r& g; C6 ?, P1 W( S, d# e
region of the buckle becomes an uncon¯ned ¯lm but the remainder of the
  g: x2 A& s& X! l¯lm is partially con¯ned.
. }, G, p  W+ |0 |7 }The categorization of thin ¯lm systems as summarized in Figure 1.1 is
" M; Z1 n# F* `# F; q. h1 Cbased on relative physical dimensions and makes no reference to any length
7 u1 H- |) b) nscale re°ecting the underlying structure of the material. There is usually a
* c8 b/ I: c; m* Qheirarchy of such length scales associated with a material of given chemical
% N. y2 t( t% n% b# V: ?composition, and the scales can depend on the processing methods used to- I7 z9 n6 r' H4 Q, B! Q' W% f+ Z
form the material structure. For example, for a polycrystalline ¯lm, intrinsic" G7 g6 h; _$ C  W8 s* Z5 Z. a
length scales include the size of the atomic unit cell, the spacing of crystalline
1 k/ E' k' j6 k6 Pdefects, and the size of the crystal grains, at the very least. Thus, a further
, g0 s& W, X4 T8 R: [subcategorization of ¯lm con¯gurations based on a comparison of the small6 A. C* y" G" \$ Q3 t, r% ]
dimension of the thin structure to the absolute length scale characteristic of
+ f5 v, a/ {  W2 e2 K' P# |  W, Qthe constituent material must be considered.# J: C& s( l, e, R! x
When the thickness of the ¯lm is small compared to that of the substrate% }- C1 m- v' n& e2 `; \
(typically by a factor of 50 or more), it represents a mechanically thin
5 y0 Y; c5 v2 M3 y% A1 Y; D5 b4 pfilm. In this case, the ¯lm material either has no intrinsic structural length
# f( f, z4 s; Q+ ~) ?6 l& Gscales, as in the case of an amorphous ¯lm, or the ¯lm thickness is much, p: r8 I' {/ t6 O5 s, I4 v
larger than all the characteristic microstructural length scales such as the% m+ j  e/ M' F- m
grain size, dislocation cell size, precipitate or particle spacing, diameter of# u7 O2 c2 J9 E; M; X4 R
the dislocation loops, mean free path for dislocation motion, or the magnetic% Z) i  B' P: ?+ I( p4 I+ l! D3 ]$ X* C
domain wall size. Such structures, typically tens or hundreds of micrometers' Z/ j) O% A- V' C
in thickness, are deposited onto substrates by plasma spray or physical7 L) V1 E6 \# @$ d5 b
vapor deposition, or layers bonded to substrates through welding, di®usion
4 E1 y7 P( @' [; L; Obonding, explosion cladding, sintering or self-propagating high temperature  X6 H# j. R' w1 v# A0 P9 ~6 G
combustion synthesis. This de¯nition, of course, holds only when the size% F- g  O3 |/ x2 R
scale of the microstructure is small compared to the ¯lm thickness. The
+ g* v& S: h8 P) x: x2 X* Econtinuum mechanics approach to be presented for the analysis of stress,
0 @7 K3 A' o: wsubstrate curvature and fracture in such mechanically thin ¯lms applies to
% o9 S# L. ~5 ]- X8 sa broad range of practical situations.
" F) W) v/ D% [2 NWhen the small dimension of the material structure is comparable to
! T7 Z' q: ~6 m" Cthe characteristic microstructural size scale, the ¯lm is considered to be a2 c+ D4 T0 O* [/ M9 P
microstructurally thin film. Most metallic thin ¯lms used in microelectronic' G3 Y: V  ^6 d
devices and magnetic storage media are examples of microstructurally thin9 [/ G& {/ \: q3 U4 h8 ~; F
¯lms, where the ¯lm thickness is substantially greater than atomic or molecular
, A; a7 Y( e; [& S& hdimensions. Although the ¯lm thickness normally includes only a few
4 o* L! ?" |' q! a: P7 A" _4 F1 O6 Introduction and Overview
* b. _' Z' z; ~9 Zmicrostructural units in these cases, the plane of the ¯lm has dimensions signi
9 e) V) q- x  ~! J* y3 C¯cantly larger than the characteristic microstructural size scale. The mechanical7 q1 j+ t' d( a0 `' j" |  _
properties of these ¯lms are much more strongly in°uenced by such
* U# c( K1 m/ X( _' C: hfactors as average grain size, grain shape, grain size distribution, and crystallographic# r! B; C: [: I
texture than in the case of mechanically thin ¯lms. Grain to grain
) ?/ r2 A5 A: V; Jvariations in crystallographic orientation as well as crystalline anisotropy of: w, z4 R0 y! n; n) `6 ?
thermal, electrical, magnetic and mechanical properties also have a more. L1 s2 y: I6 l4 ~9 r9 r* X
pronounced e®ect on the overall mechanical response of microstructurally
% W. \8 k* v8 N4 W0 n# Cthin ¯lms. The mechanisms and mechanics of microstructurally thin ¯lms
  s1 q- r" h: z3 K# N( `/ W- E. [9 qare considered extensively throughout this book. A microstructurally thin
& z: _5 }" s0 D9 z, Z) H  \) O* Q¯lm can be patterned into lines or stripes on the substrate surface, in which
4 i" A. j6 B; D9 i4 S* ycase the cross-sectional dimensions of each line are comparable to the microstructural1 V- z$ l. {9 R- l! _/ o8 {
unit dimension. For single crystal ¯lms epitaxially bonded to
% _5 i( z  K1 y) s- w2 s3 Krelatively thick substrates, the only microstructurally signi¯cant dimension
% j; k2 d4 R) j2 K5 R' Yis the lattice spacing. Consequently, such ¯lms can usually be treated as
) H8 W7 m2 H. j% n; K* T8 Xmicrostructurally thin ¯lms even though the ¯lm thickness may be as small
5 x, e% H" F( ~) |5 \as several times the atomic unit cell dimension. Such structures are studied
4 Y/ X7 K# @9 V5 ?8 c! Win Chapter 6.8 a$ x3 j0 {/ a( g3 d$ L! D, r
Atomically thin films constitute layers whose thicknesses are comparable
; F" Z2 ]/ C2 s9 `" o4 c+ `to one or a few atomic layers. An adsorbed monolayer of gas or impurity( }; h$ L0 U  c* G
atoms on a surface is an example of an atomically thin layer. Here the
0 b% }! t( G& r$ V2 n" smechanical response of the thin layer is likely to be more in°uenced by interatomic/ z% N/ t& S8 U: n; B# r3 X, S' m- @
potentials and surface energy than by macroscopic mechanical
) Q' Y( v3 W0 Y# b# f8 dproperties or by micromechanisms of deformation." Y8 \- D6 S7 R5 g
1.2 Film deposition methods9 m6 d9 ]9 D5 ?2 f& ^, c
Physical vapor deposition (PVD) and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) are9 l1 `' q  m. K$ t
the most common methods for transferring material atom by atom from
! U4 L4 P( h# }# Y8 p& w0 b; o3 @5 V! V* [one or more sources to the growth surface of a ¯lm being deposited onto$ O+ b9 c2 C) C2 O& M$ Y7 q' E  L
a substrate. Vapor deposition describes any process in which a solid immersed
6 E- z) \! C/ b, s1 W: i% ?, _in a vapor becomes larger in mass due to transference of material
. g$ v7 G, C  z' c0 Wfrom the vapor onto the solid surface. The deposition is normally carried
. E5 i) L2 E" m# v1 d/ V) q" Bout in a vacuum chamber to enable control of the vapor composition. If the4 F5 `7 }! b) B8 U  x
vapor is created by physical means without a chemical reaction, the process+ }; i) m; r0 v
is classi¯ed as PVD; if the material deposited is the product of a chemical
$ W! @. |" F. v" l6 Zreaction, the process is classi¯ed as CVD. Many variations of these basic5 G9 o6 |2 O: T5 S" z# b
vapor deposition methods have been developed in e®orts to balance advantages
+ A  Q% [, `4 Yand disadvantages of various strategies based on the requirements of
$ w: b5 ]5 B- d5 I% W" b: E¯lm purity, structural quality, the rate of growth, temperature constraints
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|光学薄膜论坛

GMT, 2026-10-24 , Processed in 0.025167 second(s), 25 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.5 Licensed

© 2001-2026 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表